Was not aware this had been hashed out. The last larfleeze thread degenerated and I stopped reading it.

And I'd agree with you and if I were a judge make it know that's how I'd rule, but till we get an errata it's not official and you can attack larfleeze through his constructs. Dumb but it'll get fixed

My question about Larfleeze is: if he uses phasing/teleport, will his constructs be able to move? My question arises from the fact that a charter is "placed" when they use phasing/teleport and Larfleeze's Orange Construct power says, "Whenever Larfleeze is moved, after all actions resolve you may move any or all Orange Construct objects an equal amount." Emphasis on the word "moved" in the power text

ok then thanks vicious x .....

Yes. Phasing/Teleport moves a character. It does not place it.

From the Fantastic Four PAC:

No official announcement about what the changes are has been made.

I would argue against this on the grounds of historical precedent.

Look at LoSH:
Taking out the fluff:
Giant characters are adjacent to standard characters for close combat purposes.

This never made a two way street, so when the same basic language is used today I see no reason to definitively say, as you have, that one MUST rule a certain way unless there is errata.
You're incorrect. A character moves with P/T. It is not placed.

Since the character moves, the constructs move, too.

Changes are being made to the way that objects move? I hadn't heard that.

Thanks for setting me straight, guys!

While it's undeniable that there is historical precedent, I think that's a very bad precedent that should not have been ruled the way it was. Even at the time, I considered that a clear case of the rules saying one thing and the ruling going entirely contrary to it without it being given as errata. But that's just me.

YEAH! Hooray for reason!

*well done, Norm!*

Actually those rules were clear. Harpua left out the next paragraph which made everything clear.

From p. 42 of the Legion of Super Heroes Rulebook:
No matter what that first paragraph meant, the second paragraph made it clear that standard characters were not adjacent for close combat purposes.

Larfleeze's effect, of course, doesn't do that.

Great... another example of my memory getting fuzzy.

Why are you quoting from the Legion rulebook? Use the most recent one.

The point was that the same language used for Larfleeze has been used previously. When it was used at that time, it was accepted to not create adjacency both ways.