You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
Originally posted by ShadowDeth Malleus, why do you keep supporting "F&P"? It's a silly name given to ONE specific army. It doesn't in any way describe what you are trying to explain it as.
Originally posted by Malleus For one, I don't "support" Fling and Ping. I don't have a problem with it as an army type, but I myself do not play it.
Secondly, I disagree that it describes "ONE specific army." A search of the Battle Formations forum yields over a dozen "Fling and Ping" armies, only a few of which are by 42up. Whether the term (not the archetype itself, important distinction) started with one person or one army is irrelevent.
rgayua asked for an explanation of what F&P was and I wrote one based on my understanding. Feel free to offer a better one.
A search of battle formations will also reveal a number of people who cannot create armies without the internet. Unimaginative clones who will latch onto any "term" they can to make themselves feel better then the local "unschooled" peons at the game shop.
Fling and Ping was supposed to be 42's name for his army. It's not a term to describe archetype, as ML allready holds that position.