Don't you need adjacency to make a close combat attack?

Characters occupying a Construct are considered adjacent to Lafleeze. Batman starts undr a light object, but it gets switched with a Construct.

And it's in the power description. Curse my tired brain!

No probs, check out my math skills in the White Lantern thread.

Q: If you placed barriers and two of them are caddy cornered to form a wall protecting your opponent (not really, it was placed to keep them from getting to me). On your next turn, barrier disappears at start of turn and poison is dealt at start of turn, what happens first? It was argued that since the barrier was there, no damage.

Barrier reads, in part:

Poison, meanwhile, reads:

Something that lasts "until the beginning of your next turn" does not last INTO your next turn. If this is your next turn, we are past the point where barrier has gone away.

Or, to say it more simply, your barrier tokens from your last turn always go away before Poison occurs.

And here's the rules to back up Suttkus:

You are correct.

I'm very much against this "off the map" language that keeps getting tossed around in regards to objects. If an object was off the map, it should be able to be affected by any effect. However, there are characters that are able to affect carried objects. (Sargon being one of them.) As such, carried objects are not off the map. That said, it's been ruled that since the Orange Construct objects are not "continual," they do not have the properties granted by Larfleeze's trait when they are carried so Larfleeze cannot make an attack through a carried Orange Construct object.

Some quick questions:

On movement, while a Construct can move under an opposing figure, it can't just go under an object, can it? If it can't go around it, then it has to go through and stop because standard objects are considered hindering for movement. Right?

On creation of the Constructs, since two objects can occupy the same square apparently with neither being destroyed, then could Larfleeze theoretically create Construct on top of a Construct on top of a Construct and so on and so on?

Also, I've seen that if someone uses Mind Control on Larfleeze, that they can then attack through his Constructs. But what if they choose to just move Larfleeze instead? After the move action is done, does the Mind Controller then get to move the Constructs or since that action is done, the figure reverts to the original player and they get to move the Constructs?

Additionally, let's say Larfleeze has Nanobots on him and he's also got a friendly figure with Perplex on his team. Can the person with Perplex modify Larfleeze's damage value by -1 so he can then use Nanobots to remove a Construct and heal for 2 (so long as Larfleeze is the only one adjacent to the Construct)?

Lastly, if someone played the BFC Damage Control:
That means Larfleeze can't make any Constructs since they are objects, right?

*EDIT*
And what about Proximity Mines:
Does that mean Larfleeze takes his life into his hands if he has a Construct adjacent to him? And that he can also send some exploding little Constructs towards his opponent?

Yes, that would be the case. HeroClix doesn't really have a Z-axis, so "go under" the other object has no definition. When two objects are in a square, they are both on top, as it were.

This is fine.

I thought it was turtles all the way down, turns out it's Larfleeze constructs. Who knew?

Now this is a good question! I don't think I've seen this one asked.

The trick here is that the orange constructs move "after actions resolve". Larfleeze going back to his owner's control probably isn't considered part of "actions resolve" but something else that happens after "actions resolve". My instinct here is to say that as an ambiguous timing issue, it takes place in the order of the current player's choosing, but I'd like to hear what other people think.

The rulebook says, "Combat values can’t be modified to meet the prerequisites to use a feat." What this ends up meaning is that you cannot Perplex a combat value to meet a feat's prerequisites, but you can use Perplex to prevent an opposing character from meeting the feat's prerequisites. I really don't like this rule, but there it is. I had to rule against a player at my venue last week because of it.

That's exactly what this means. Larfleeze, however, is hardly the first figure to find himself complete devalued by a well chosen BFC.

Yes, that's what it means. But, good news! I'd say that since proximity mines removes the object AFTER the damage is dealt, so Larfleeze can "Orange Lackey" the damage onto the object that's exploding. (Mastermine isn't a damage reducer, so Proximity Mines won't ignore it.)

Wow, i totally thought this was in the OP.

If someone else moves Larfleeze, the owner of Lerfleeze moves the Constructs. In the case of MC, Larfleeze returns to it's owner after the action, and after the action resolves is when the Constructs are moved. Opposing TK also does this, though KB does not, due to the wording.

In the case of Possession, it depends on who owns Larfleeze after the movement.

Suttkus is right on all other accounts.

And just so it's clear, while it's not clear in the wording of the effect, it has been ruled that an Orange Contruct object will stop if it moves into hindering terrain (from non-hindering terrain.)

What are you saying about knock back?

Wasn't there something with the wording of KB such that it didnt count as movement to activate the Constructs? Maybe I made that up in my head =\

I see what you were saying now. You are correct. (It's more an official comment in the Player's Guide than the wording of knock back.)

From the Player's Guide: