Some new updates, I might add another Controller when I get another.

Whatcha guys think now?

So what... Now my deck is to 1337 for Realms...? Come on you guys

Jeepers...60 matches and only lost 2...wow... @_@ In the side-deck, replace one of your Raigeki Breaks with Confiscation. That's the best I can do with it. 9.5/10.

Confiscation = ...

1. Bad Topdeck
2. - 1000
3. I already ahve hand control
4. I do not like the card, only good opening hand I think.



Geik Break = PWNAGE, with NA of even Sinister. It is a DUst, and Sac Armor in 1 for a discard... Hell I can even destroy FD monsters!

-1 Airknight
+1 D.D. Warrior Girl

Good cards should be played in copies of 3.

-1 Cylinder
+1 Ceasefire

Ceasefire: Chainable. Potential to cause more damage. Negates flips.
Cylinders: Unchainable. Can't negate flips. Stops 1 ATK but not the creature.

I'm impressed. You came up with a decent Control. However, my personal preference for Control decks is 42 cards.

Now why couldn't you fix my deck correctly if you can build such a nice one?

I fixed it to my experience with the cards. DDA many poeple here use them, and I trample countless amounts of them or just kill them easily, they are not to good from what I know. Exiled has NEVER posed a threat to me. 2 People use it, they waste a RotA on it to sac to destroy a Don, DDWL of a FD card (70% of the time Sinister).

DDWL is a decent card, I prefer NA to them but they are BLS food and good run ins when needed. I do not like 3, it is overkill, Airkngihts are way better.

Cylinder negates, plain and simple. Ceasefire doesn't and screws my flip effects.

No duh... people don't use D.D. Assassins correctly in your area or something. They are to be used like copies of DDWL.

Exiled: Taking out any non-sinister serpent card is GOOD.

Night Assassin: Crossout = gg. Can't suicide. Reactive card.

DDWL can both be reactive AND active; Night can't be used on your turn, DDWL can. DDWL can serve as a beatdown attacker, Night can't... Simply, DDWL is better. Just use it unless you can't afford one... then that's a different matter.

Wasting RoTA:

It isn't a waste; it's a 1 for 1 advantage so how can it be "waste"; they have lost nothing. Then exiled is a 1 for 1 advantage. Really, they've only lost tempo; not anything in terms of card advantage. Remember, with Night Assassin, you also lose tempo...

Cylinders and negating attacks:

Replace drains with Pits then. Ceasefire screws their flips too. It'll work more often than you think. However, after testing so extensively, perhaps you've found that Cylinders works better though it's unchainable, reactive, and only stops 1 creature which rarely saves you...

well usually i comment on these decks and try and change a few things but you have explained why you need alot of the cards so all i can say is congrats on the amount of tourneys won and if i were you i would keep running this and keep pwning everyone because IMO winning can never be boring.
Once again great deck 9.3/10

People down here do use DDA like DDWL, just 6 removal is overkill, 3 is enough if not more plus DDA is a DDWL with limited abilibilites. Which sucks.

Exiled = Slow, Waste of Summon. Monster removal should be depentant upon Spells and Traps, Monsters are there for control and beatdown. That is how a true control runs.

Night Assailant = If crossouted that is alright, most likely I will have 1 or 2 in my GY, and no one down here uses Crossout.

DDWL is a good card no doubt, but not expandable like Night Assailant. While searving as a "Beat" monster and the quick removal it lacks in the department of choosing like Night Assailant can. Also since when I side I use 2 MoF, Fiber, 2 Slate and 3 Night Assailant I take out the DDWL, since I also run alot of discard cards. Like I said before removal should never be dependant upon monsters.

1 for 1 is good wasting a summon to kill a monster. Good in some terms not in most. You lose baord advatage because you have already summoned. I never said the card was bad just to slow I have better things to run in replace of it that work alot better.

Drain are staple in control, the discard factor is all I really want. I do not need Bottomless in this control deck. Cylinder has it's place here over ceasefire; which I beleive only should be in Burn Decks.

Monsters 16

Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning
Jinzo
Blade Knight
Blade Knight
D. D. Warrior Lady
D. D. Warrior Lady
D. D. Warrior Lady
Magician of Faith
Don Zaloog
Don Zaloog
Kycoo, the Ghost Destroyer
Kycoo, the Ghost Destroyer
Breaker, the Magical Warrior
Magical Scientist
Tribe Infecting Virus
Sinister Serpent

Spells - 18
Enemy Controller
Enemy Controller
Book of Moon
Book of Moon
Scapegoat
Scapegoat
Creature Swap
Creature Swap
Metamorphosis
Change of Heart
Snatch Steal
Heavy Storm
Mystical Space Typhoon
Swords of Revealing Light
Painful Choice
Pot of Greed
Forceful Sentry
Premature Burial

Traps - 6
Sakuretsu Armor
Raigeki Break
Call of the Haunted
Ring of Destruction
Torrential Tribute
Magic Cylinder

I have seen a lot of decks and i guess they are biting off each other or they read about using scapegoats and metamorphasis somehwere because of all the decks i have rated 5 that are about control and they are all practically the same thing however with your deck i added anothe DD and a Blade Knight they are much better monsters and they are BLS bait. Jinzo hey i dunno maybe i am old fashion but he is a form of control no traps on your opponents side good

Luck

Eh, Airknight > Jinzo IMHO. Jinzo is a Side card for me. I don't like 3 DDWL, and 1 Blade is good enough for me, if needed I have one side decked!

Some new updates, tell me whatcha guys think, tourny this Sunday!

So like... Perfectin niowÉ Maybe I should add in another controller and swap for the 2 smashing