As anyone else ever noticed that when you see a thread with the words Hacking Hunters in it people swarm to it? Must be the fancy link oh well. This deck still looks good man, whenever I see this thing I still see nothing wrong with it. 9/10

I know I don't give much insight, but could you still take a look at my deck?

BTW: how the heck do you make those weird squiggles anyway?

I don't know why you want me to help you. Plus I hate posting in threads that have more than a three pages to them, two is just pushing it for my taste. But over five! I mean come on, that's just insane.

Ok, the only thing I really would say is Blade Knight < DD Assailant mostly becuase removal.

This is beatdown, ja? Well... for the most part it looks pretty good. Due to some personal preferences though, I would probably go with a Mobius instead of Blowback, because it's quicker and the attack, though only 100 higher, still provides for that extra "Shabam!".

Now for the Blade Knight/Different Dimension Assailant thing... I'd take them both out for the Enraged Battle Ox', but that's just me going for more of the Beastdown type thing. And if not those 2, then the Kycoos, they are without a doubt, Chaos neutering monsters.

I also dislike the Scientist with a passion... my personal preference is Cyber Jar, but that's because I like drawing action, field control, and swarmage. Now for the spell cards... I think running two of both Creature Swap and Nobleman of Crossout is just asking for trouble. That would be the crappiest top decking I would ever see LOL. Try to minimize it by getting rid of one of each.

Maybe throw in a bit more techage... I've always favored 2 C.E.Devices just for field control, and other then that your traps look very adequete. Honestly, I can't think of any more changes besides that. Most of my decks run at 45 cards, but I know that alot of people think it's too slow to run at that many, so I wont suggest adding any more cards. So... lookin good, I give this deck a rating of 8.8/10.

The rating is slightly lower then what it would be, because I'm not fond of hybrids... which this looks like... since you have the potential to go Beastdown but instead you have removal in there as well and even though I don't get what the Painful Choice is for... I decided not to touch it. So... good job dude, and thanks for fixing/rating my deck.

i would add airknight for blowback.

other than that, you have a really solid beat down 9.2/10

-2 Blade
-3 Slate

Seriously, if Blade Knight becomes useful, you've lost...

+3 D.D. Assassin
+1 Fiber Jar [Morphing Jar if you can afford it]
+1 Initiate Troops

Very godly...

Here is why D.D. Assassin is the best beatdown monster:

IT CAN KILL ANYTHING IN THE GAME THAT ISN'T IN DEFENSE MODE AND HAS OVER 1650 DEF OR A SPIRIT REAPER.

It is a superior Beatdown monster than even Berserk Gorilla, simply because it can permanently and instantly eliminate a threat.

Otherwise, very nice job...

From experience, when you start topdecking, you're already losing.

In ADV format, Hand Advantage is even more important, because there are no longer g0d topdecks like Raigeki or Chaos Emperor Dragon to save you in case you're about to die.

Why play a card that's only useful when losing?

Dude... Blowback<Mobius???!! Wow!! Mobius is a one time thing and unless he's back in the hand, he's only good one. I say stick with blowback. It's removal will certainly be more handy than Mobius