You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
I played in a sealed event last night where someone pulled a Scarlet Centurion and I have a quick question about his trait.
It says:
MANIPULATE AVENGERS PAST AND PRESENT: Scarlet Centurion can use Mind Control. When he does, if he targets one or more characters with the Avengers keyword, modify his attack value by +3.
My question is, if he targets say Thor (WITH keyword) AND another figure (WITHOUT an Avengers keyword) for Mind Control, does he get the +3 attack vs. BOTH figures or just the one Avengers keyword figure?
MANIPULATE AVENGERS PAST AND PRESENT: Scarlet Centurion can use Mind Control. When he does, if he targets one or more characters with the Avengers keyword, modify his attack value by +3.
Quote : Originally Posted by mirandir
Yes. If the +3 where only against the character(s) with the avengers keyword then it would state that.
You only get the +3 if you target at least one character with the Avengers keyword. If you were to target multiple characters and none of them had the Avengers keyword you would not get the bonus.
Yes. If the +3 where only against the character(s) with the avengers keyword then it would state that.
I disagree with this as it has never been ruled that way in the past.
The oldest example I can recall is the 2000AD team ability.
Quote
At any time during the game, you may declare an opposing team ability or character as your target. Once the character or team ability is chosen, it may not be changed. All characters using the 2000 AD team ability increase their attack value by 1 when attacking the chosen character or a character possessing the chosen team ability.
The old E&C had this to say about it under modifiers:
Quote
When a modifier during an attack is based on a figure meeting a particular criteria (usually the targeted character), then that modifier only applies to the targeted character(s) but would not apply to any targeted characters that did not meet the criteria.
Unfortunately that clarification is not listed among the stuff on the current site. Could that indicate a reversal? Sure, but there's no guarantee of that. I would hope it has been reversed in an effort of simplification, but I would say that it is worth checking on the WIN.
EDIT: To be clear, the quotes I am giving are from a very outdated documented which is no longer official. I'm quoting to point out how this has been historically ruled to work because I'm not aware of any recent rulings to the contrary of those old rulings.
It very well could be the case that the ruling was not included because it has been reversed, but it is also possible that it was not included because it was was still true but deemed to be no longer needed to be published for some reason, like if they felt that it was covered somewhere else.
Yes. If the +3 where only against the character(s) with the avengers keyword then it would state that.
This is the correct answer.
"He's Predator Smurf! Not Happy Smurf or Gleeful Smurf or even PMSing Smurfette! He's Predator Smurf! What kind of attitude do you think he's gonna have?" -Songwriterz-
I disagree with this as it has never been ruled that way in the past.
Unfortunately that clarification is not listed among the stuff on the current site. Could that indicate a reversal? Sure, but there's no guarantee of that. I would hope it has been reversed in an effort of simplification, but I would say that it is worth checking on the WIN.
EDIT: To be clear, the quotes I am giving are from a very outdated documented which is no longer official. I'm quoting to point out how this has been historically ruled to work because I'm not aware of any recent rulings to the contrary of those old rulings.
It very well could be the case that the ruling was not included because it has been reversed, but it is also possible that it was not included because it was was still true but deemed to be no longer needed to be published for some reason, like if they felt that it was covered somewhere else.
That hasn't been the case for quite some time. There's no more calculating values separately like that.
...and you are more than welcome to submit your question directly to them if somebody here hasnt already done that.
"A Jester unemployed is nobody's fool." - The Court Jester "And so he says, I don't like the cut of your jib, and I go, I says it's the only jib I got, baby!
You only ever calculate your attack total once per combat action.
1. Are you using mind control? Yes.
2. Does one or more of the targeted characters have the Avengers keyword? Yes.
3. {Add +3 to Scarlet Centurion's attack value}
4. {Roll 2d6 + Scarlet Centurion's modified attack value, versus all targeted character's defense values}
Bam.
WKO 3/24/18 - 1st Place - Orlando, FL
Are you looking to buy wkMP18-005 Lockjaw? PM me.
IMPRISON AND CURE SUPER-BEINGS: Scarlet Centurion can use Incapacitate. When he does, counter all powers the hit character possesses until your next turn.
if my opponent uses this power and counters all my figures powers, then my figure after words takes damage and reveals new powers, are those power countered as well or only ones showing when the incap was used?
Just to add my 2p an example of calculating values thingie was ruled under Shredder Clone. There might well be earlier examples but just in case someone needed a link.
Quote
When making an attack against multiple characters, any replacements or modifiers that would apply to a combat value are calculated for that single attack against all characters being attacked. You don't calculate separately for each character being attacked.
IMPRISON AND CURE SUPER-BEINGS: Scarlet Centurion can use Incapacitate. When he does, counter all powers the hit character possesses until your next turn.
if my opponent uses this power and counters all my figures powers, then my figure after words takes damage and reveals new powers, are those power countered as well or only ones showing when the incap was used?
From the E&C:
Quote
[C]Certain game effects can counter powers or abilities. When a power or ability is countered, the power or ability is considered lost for the duration of the countering effect. Only possessed powers or abilities may be countered. You may not counter a power or ability that a character “can use”.
In your scenario, the duration is until your next turn and the powers being countered are the powers being possessed.
Possessed powers (from the 2014 rule book):
Quote
A character possesses a power or ability if that power is printed on their dial in the form of a white or colored square, or if an icon granting that ability is printed on their base. A character may also possess a power or ability if a special power or trait ability states that they “have” or “possess” that power or ability.