You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
Actions
Galactus can be given one action during his
controller’s turn. Galactus can be pushed
even when he has two action tokens; he does
not take pushing damage. If you assign an
action to Galactus when he already has two
action tokens, do not mark him with another
action token.
But characters like Huklbuster have a trait:
DESIGNED TO PUT YOU DOWN, BRUCE: At the beginning of the game for all characters with this trait, choose an opposing character with , , , or . That character can't ignore pushing damage or have its combat values increased.
Since it says in Galactus rules he doesn't take push, does that bypass the HB cannot ignore pushing damage?
WizKids won't answer this and will tell you to ask your local judge, likely. . . but if we take it literally, there is no word "ignore" in Galactus's description, so there should not be an interaction here at all. Galactus should be OK.
WizKids won't answer this and will tell you to ask your local judge, likely. . . but if we take it literally, there is no word "ignore" in Galactus's description, so there should not be an interaction here at all. Galactus should be OK.
I am my Local Judge for the most part. I see it as since he never took it to begin with he would not have anything to ignore. I really wanted to see what the community has ruled on it.
but if we take it literally, there is no word "ignore" in Galactus's description, so there should not be an interaction here at all. Galactus should be OK.
I agree. Since the older terminology doesn't use the term Ingore, he's not ignoring Pushing Damage, even though the result is functionally similar.
Quote : Originally Posted by dairoka
I'm pretty sure Dragon has the Future keyword and Probability Control.
Quote : Originally Posted by Dragon
With the amount of times you are Ninja'd I swear you must have the Past Keyword
There have been rulings in the past that "does not take (whatever)" is not the same as ignoring. Like RC said, WKs themselves likely won't answer the question since it's a Golden Age piece, but I'd certainly say we have precedent.