Wow, I actually read that without a problem :p


Very good deck, looks like it would topdeck well too.

The only thing I might change would be taking out airknight, I dont know how 2 tributes would do in aggr0, but if its working for you, keep it.

Looks standard... not much help but all I can really say is to try and maybe fit in 2 creature swaps for your scapegoats. I would maybe suggest taking the bottomless traps holes for them, but i guess it just depends on how good they work for you.

only thing i dont like dude.... IFL

-ifl
+blade knight(cant think of anything else.. maybe even a bounder dude)

but otehr than that good job... look at light deck in sig???

agh! runnin' Swaps over Crossouts in aggro?

-2 swaps
+2 Crossouts

overall nice deck. plus just for pref. u should take out BTH for Sakuretsus cause they are more versitile.

imo, -2 bottomless trap holes + compulsory evac device.

Well IMO, I think you should play it out here adding a King Tiger Wanghu ( I know it sounds stupid) But for those who run those weenies that can be a hazard to us big guys, it can eliminate that threat for good

-2 Swap
+2 Xout.

There is absolutely ZERO excuse for not using double crossouts in ANY form of an aggro deck.

-1 Controller
-1 Vortex

What's vortex going to be used for with Gorillas out, meaning either they kill it and summon (1) monster, or they set? Either way, you aren't using Vortex, and it's going to be a fancy smashing ground (very, very expensive) most of the time with a discard cost.

+2 Smash/Reinforcement

Absolutely necessary in any aggro. Not only that, the range of searchables you have is pretty high, and targeted removal > mass removal with cost in any sort of aggro deck. You have EBO for goat trample, so tell me 1 reason you'd use Vortex other than BLS/Jinzo/Airknight on the field at the same time (and then you're dead anyways because the chances of having Vortex are slim).

Good enough though.

Well here's my whack at it:

Your Monster layout is 2 thumbs up. The cards are either beatsticks or removal. Sweet.

I only have 1 change for this deck in fact. Usually got a few more lol.

The RoTA.

Why?

To get more removal? Sure it's great topdeck, but it doesn't fulfill the essence of aggro enough. The RoTA looks way too much like space filler. You don't need to search for DDs as they should be topping at a balanced rate. In place of it, maindeck Ceasefire!!!! It's Aggro, so be aggressive and get their LP to 0 ASAP. Ceasefire owns your opponent's MoFs and whatnot. With the swarming capabilities of this deck, you can easily slap away a 1/4 of your opponen't LP.

As for the CEDevice/BTH controversy, I think that's a no brainer. CEDevices are horrible. Sure you get 1 open attack, but what about next turn? It's not even removal, just stall/bounce? STALL? IN AGGRO? WTF? No, don't do it. Yes I know people will argue that thanks to a a well-timed CEDevice you can deliver the game-crushing blow, but how many times is that going to occur so it makes you want to use it? That's noob talk right there.

BTH on the other hand is removal and tech against Pyramid Turtles for aggressive moments. Not to mention it owns CCCs and other Aggros.

I don't know why people are suggesting CEDevices, it's just flat out stupid.

Great deck though, Aggro sure was popular like a month ago: 9.4/10

Mind checking out the Almight Exaltation? Thanks.