You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
CREATURES [16]
{1}Black Luster Soldier~Envoy Of The Beggining
{1}Airknight Parshath
{1}Cybernetic Magician
{2}Night Assailant
{2}Magician Of Faith
{1}Tribe~Infecting Virus
{1}Sangan
{1}Breaker The Magical Warrior
{1}Sinister Serpent
{2}Tsukuyomi
{2}Dekoichi The Battlechanted Locamotive
{1}D.D. Warrior Lady
SPELLS [17]
{1}Pot Of Greed
{1}Graceful Charity
{1}Delinquent Duo
{1}Premature Burial
{2}Nobleman Of Crossout
{2}Book Of Moon
{1}Heavy Storm
{1}Lightning Vortex
{1}Mystical Space Typhoon
{1}Swords Of Revealing Light
{1}Back To Square One
{2}Scapegoat
{2}Metamorphosis
{1}Monster Reincarnation
TRAPS [6]
{1}Ring Of Destruction
{1}Call Of The Haunted
{1}Torrential Tribute
{1}Mirror Force
{2}Sakuretsu Armors
Thanks for the suggestions. I ran this deck with 2 airknights for a long time, but now i think ima stick with 1 cause i love the magician. Have u ever been hit with a 2000 attack magician of faith or magical merchant. for no cost if i played my hand right in the early game. I think ima take out my body as a shield for back to square one and keep the locamotive so i can attack with it if needed. I dont really like raigeki break or tribute to the doomed. I think back to sqare one is better advantage. Dusts are in my side. I am also dropping the magical merchant for the monster reincarnation. again thanks for the suggestions. anyone else?
nothing much to do except replave the back to square one with a dilinquent duo and replace one sakuretsu armor with a bottemless trap hole.
o and maybe replace the battlechanted locomotivex2 with a kycoo and a blade knight
i already have a delinquent duo in there and if i would take out the locamotives for kycoo/blade knight it would make my deck just another CCC and i really dont want that. I know wing wind blast is better than btso but for some reason i just have better luck with back to square one, and also if i exchanged them i wouldnt be able to reuse the wing blast like i can btso with magician of faith. Thanks for the imput though. keep it coming.
p.s.: i won a 34 person online tournament with this yesterday
if i would take out the locamotives for kycoo/blade knight it would make my deck just another CCC and i really dont want that.
Hate to break it to you, but the deck you're using is in fact, a CCCC. The only difference between this and every other deck is that you're using Dekoichi over Slate Warrior, and a single Back to Square One in the Magic lineup. Everything else is completely standard.
Hate to break it to you, but the deck you're using is in fact, a CCCC. The only difference between this and every other deck is that you're using Dekoichi over Slate Warrior, and a single Back to Square One in the Magic lineup. Everything else is completely standard.
-sakuretsu armor
+dust tornado
Just for a bit of M/T removal.
This is not a CCCC. Like i have said before CCCC dont play night assailants. The deck u are talking about is tsukuyomi control which is alot different. And i know that there is only a few cards difference between mine and the shonan jump decks but that makes it mine. If i would take out the dekoichis everyone here would just call me a netdecker and u know it. Why are ppl on this forum such a**es about CCC.
also again dust is in the side. I dont like it main deck it just dosent work for me.
People on this site (myself especially) are such "a**es" about it, as you so eloquently put it, because we're sick and tired of people posting the same thing over and over again with only a few cards differing between them. If you want to be a sheep and use CCCC, go on ahead, nothing I can say or do will stop you. But posting it online when there's already tons of the same thing is just repetitive, annoying, and pointless.
And Night Assailant, while not in every deck, is VERY mainstream at this point in time. Plenty of cookies use it.