khan rava(marrowdrinker) -137
3x zombie centaur*** -96
elven alcolyte* -18
grave robber*** -19
dark crusader*** -29
-299

or

vithzerai -214
emerald warder -68
elven alcolyte* -18
-300

Vithzerai is great but i think it would be more fun to play the khan rava army you have. not to mention its pretty good...

Just taking the 2 armies at face value with analyzing the strength or weakness of either I would say # 1. Since 2.0 is all about objectives then you need to have sufficient forces employed to claim and challenge objectives if your opponent kills either the Warder or Acolyte then the max you can claim is 2. Any solid army can handle 2 healers if they are only dealing with 3 warriors as an opponent (you would need to do lots of pushing to maintain your opponent's tempo).

So I would go with # 1. Rava's a fine figure anyway.

Steve

Reece, the Vitz army is bad! Vitz is just bad in 300, anyway, play the other one..

why Marrow drinker on Rava, you're playing a healer already, why not give Rava Woundkiller, and he can bound and shoot/heal the centaurs for 4 when they break!
that'll really give your opposition fits!

The first design (Khan Rava) has more flexability against domains. It also looks like it has a swiss style to combat many types.

good luck!

I'd play the first army, but if I may make a suggestion...

Elven Acolyte and Graverobber add up to 39 points, take these points, and add in a level 2 Astrus for 31 points, and *** Imp, giving you a decent harasser and a strong healer.

I suggest removing Marrowdrinker and replacing it with something like Silvercloud. Marrowdrinker forces you to give him a ranged combat action, meaning you cannot use Bound in combination.... it also prevents him from using Arcing Fire which is a very helpful ability. Silvercloud is 13pts cheaper and not only will it give him the same +1 to his ranged attack... but a +1 to his speed giving him a 9" Bound... and a possible 6 clicks of Pierce to soaring figures.