can you use incap. with this feat or not.

From the latest Marvel Errata & Clarifiaction (p. 6):
"Extended Range
• Replace the text on the card with:
Before making a ranged combat attack, the character's range may be increased for the duration of the attack by a number of squares up to its unmodified damage value. For each square the range of an attack is increased, decrease the damage value by 1 (after all other modifiers and replacements) when resolving the attack. An attack using Incapacitate does not place any action tokens on the target."

thanks Drunky!

can u use energy explosion if you have armor peircing?

Of course. It's one of my favorite combo on cheap EE figs (did somebody say V Boomerang ?).

...I might've. Sorry bout that.

Good with soo many rules one tends to forget. Which is something I'm semi dreading for Avengers/JL with the two figs we've seen there already have been confusion and bandaid errata with Red Skull (penetrating to unavoidable). Could you imagine the possible errata/confusion with approximatly 40 figs

I didn't know they errataed RS's special power to be unavoidable instead of penetrating (which is a good thing, 'cause seeing his character card I had already planned to put LMD on him to avoid the penetrating damage ), where can we see it?

Does this work on characters with a starting range of 0?

Extended Range's prerequisite reads "Range greater than 0 and less than 9", so figures with 0 range do not meet the prerequisites and cannot be assigned the feat.

Its in the preveiw it originally said penetrating but the Seth write up was changed to unavoidable

OK Repulsor rage, thanks for the info .

Did Prophus mention this at all anywhere, or are some just assuming that the card is wrong. It could go either way, until we get an official confirmation that the card is correct. Or not. Whatever.
I just haven't seen anything official, so I don't have any idea, in case someone can clue me in.
I'd like to see it stay penetrating.