You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
I don't know why we wouldn't guess that most Factions aren't in some kind of communication - otherwise why be a Faction? It seems like "there is no Town" kind of game judging by the set-up. However, you claiming you don't have it makes it look like you are Unaffiliated, thus a Neutral, thus dangerous to everyone.
Re: BTSC and Bob
If you're suspicious of BTSC, this sounds close to an admission (either of being in a faction with it, or being unaffiliated without it) as well.
If you're suspicious of BTSC, this sounds close to an admission (either of being in a faction with it, or being unaffiliated without it) as well.
I'm pretty sure both Cbob and Skullbro have BTSC, that doesn't mean with each other, but they clearly have it.
I took Skullbro's comment as trying to paint people without BTSC as unaffiliated, but that's not true. I have a faction and don't have BTSC, and I think others have said the same thing.
Skullbro and Cbob are bad for everyone not in their faction.
Commissioner of Heroclix Fantasy League - Ask me about it!
HCFL:
Follow me on Twitter @PopofHeroes
I think voting Silver is the wrong play here people.
He's unaffiliated which might be problematic, but it might not be.
Voting for cbob or skullbrother is way more advantageous - unless Silver is Sineater or Skarnn in which case he should go.
Oh, so voting for me or SB is better than voting for Silver, unless it's not? Helpful advice.
Quote : Originally Posted by grizzzadams
Re: BTSC and Bob
If you're suspicious of BTSC, this sounds close to an admission (either of being in a faction with it, or being unaffiliated without it) as well.
There's also gfish's "I expect 6 kills a night", which was in the post I responded to.
PS I'm not voting Silver because I really don't think he'd out himself as unaffiliated on D1 if he was any kind of killing role, especially if he hadn't really read the rules. I mean, would an SK come out D1 and be all "yo guys I'm neutral" and draw all the attention to himself?
Oh, so voting for me or SB is better than voting for Silver, unless it's not? Helpful advice.
There's also gfish's "I expect 6 kills a night", which was in the post I responded to.
PS I'm not voting Silver because I really don't think he'd out himself as unaffiliated on D1 if he was any kind of killing role, especially if he hadn't really read the rules. I mean, would an SK come out D1 and be all "yo guys I'm neutral" and draw all the attention to himself?
My point was you or skullbro are much more likely to be dangerous than silver. Your defensiveness without actually defending against the accusations just make you look worse.
Commissioner of Heroclix Fantasy League - Ask me about it!
HCFL:
Follow me on Twitter @PopofHeroes
If you're suspicious of BTSC, this sounds close to an admission (either of being in a faction with it, or being unaffiliated without it) as well.
My point was that being suspicious of BTSC is probably a red herring in a game of dynamic factions like this - especially in a Hybridity game.
And, in the interest of avoiding whatever Stranger's "or else" threat means, I'll go with the majority and try to get rid of a (potentially) bad Neutral, since I don't know how much time we have left.
There's also gfish's "I expect 6 kills a night", which was in the post I responded to.
PS I'm not voting Silver because I really don't think he'd out himself as unaffiliated on D1 if he was any kind of killing role, especially if he hadn't really read the rules. I mean, would an SK come out D1 and be all "yo guys I'm neutral" and draw all the attention to himself?
gfish has been aggressive so far, but assuming your faction has a kill is not the same as admitting your faction has a kill.
I agree on Silver, I'd much rather hear a claim from him than lynch him, but if he's unwilling to play along, there's much less reason to spare him.
My point was you or skullbro are much more likely to be dangerous than silver. Your defensiveness without actually defending against the accusations just make you look worse.
I already defended myself, you just ignored it.
And that's definitely not what your post says. It says "we should lynch SB/cbob unless Silver is bad." Ok, great, how do we figure out if Silver is bad? Asking him politely to admit it? It's a meaningless statement that's just covering your bases no matter who's lynched.
My point was you or skullbro are much more likely to be dangerous than silver. Your defensiveness without actually defending against the accusations just make you look worse.
Honestly, this doesn't make any sense. You're saying SB or I is likely to be bad because you feel we have BTSC, even though this is a game where the win condition is "last 4 standing" not "eliminate rival factions." Meanwhile the only people we know are likely to be unaffiliated are Sineater (who's turning the Endless into artifacts and thus against every faction except maybe Dragon City), Skarn (former SK who works for Sineater) and Providence (who literally said she wants to kill everyone). So please explain why you think Silver's not likely to be dangerous?
(And kindly avoid just regurgitating my case, since it doesn't seem to jive with what you've been saying so far.)
PS I'm not voting Silver because I really don't think he'd out himself as unaffiliated on D1 if he was any kind of killing role, especially if he hadn't really read the rules. I mean, would an SK come out D1 and be all "yo guys I'm neutral" and draw all the attention to himself?
Not on purpose, no.
But we have to remember that this is a very unusual game and, under normal circumstances, neutral right off the bat wouldn't necessarily be nearly as sinister a claim as it is here.
For the record, being neutral is not the primary reason I'm voting for Silver. It helps as an influencing factor, but it's not the main reason.
And that's definitely not what your post says. It says "we should lynch SB/cbob unless Silver is bad." Ok, great, how do we figure out if Silver is bad? Asking him politely to admit it? It's a meaningless statement that's just covering your bases no matter who's lynched.
I read it more as "Lynching Bob/SB is more likely to have a better end result than lynching an unknown neutral, but if Silver turns out to be the SK then the end result is better."