Seems like an even deal. Personally, I shied away from both those guys in the pre-season for various reasons. I think Murray has a higher ceiling but a lower floor. Anderson is likely to get more steady work in Denver, but when both offenses are humming, I'll take Kelly's.

So one subpar underperforming dud RB1 for another subpar underperforming dud RB1?

So glad I didn't touch either of those guys in my leagues. I steered clear of Jeremy Hill too. Of course it's easy to talk trash when you have Leveon Bell in 2 of your 3 leagues and he hasn't even played yet...

Seriously though, I wouldn't jump on that train as neither has done much. You need to wait for someone to gave a big week and the. Take them while their value is up. Speaking of which, if anyone wants Travis bejamin...

Well, yes. That's sort of the point. Trying to figure out who I think has a better shot at being a productive RB going forward.

And for what it's worth, I picked up Murray in an auction league for well under list price, so I'm not upset at my decision making. Nobody predicted the Eagles offense to be this bad, and on the occasions he's actually had some room to run (usually after catching a pass) he's looked pretty good. It's just hard to get anything going when you're being hit before you get back to the line (seriously, his average yards before contact this year is -0.1). I'm just not sure that line is going to get any better.

I get that's what you're trying to do. But if that offer was made to me (on either side), that is exactly the reason why I wouldn't touch it. It's a complete toss up at this point, so I don't see what incentive I would have to make that trade aside from pure speculation.

Jeremy hill had a good week one. His issue wasn't one of lack of production or uses but security. I expect him to be back on track next week plus I still stole him with the 19th pick. The only thing I can say about having a subpar running back performance is that he isn't alone. Pretty telling when Deangelo williams is the number one fantasy runningback so they aren't alone.

Larry fitzgerald has had two big weeks...so mal... Speculating on underperforming players is the whole point. I'd rather trade an upside guy or sell high guy for a higher end drafted player then an even swap of two meh guys that were in the same relative range. But if you like a guy more now, why not.

Both teams have very weak interior O-Lines. So the logical conclusion is to work the screen game or downfield passing games, but the latter seems to be difficult for both. Philly doesn't have a very good receiving corps and their QB is average. Denver has good receivers but Manning is all but washed up. I'm pretty sure he only played this year because he wanted the all time yardage record.

Not sure why you're addressing ME here, aside from the fact that everything I touch turns to #### in FF this year...

So much of FF depends on luck as it is that 'strategy' boils down to "hope they don't get hurt" (and frankly, Fred, if you're ripping my choices in the draft, #1 - bad form, no cookies for you, #2 - considering that there weren't many top-tier of anythings available at spots 10-11, what would you have suggested at that point?)

I think Peyton still has some gas left in the tank. He wants that 2nd ring and he wants to step over Brady's corpse to get it.

I'd be willing to trade him for someone with a pulse...

Aaron Rogers is a good QB... So mal... Not sure why I'm referencing you either. . Btw, I know you were smiling on MNF when the packers had 3 guys in the locker room with knee injuries at the same time lol. EDIT: you too IR!

Also I agree FF = a complete crap shoot for the most part.

You just got bit by the injury bug hard is all. I'm still ticked that you grabbed Big Ben before I could. I got him in my two other leagues and he's doing excellent for me.

I don't question his desire, but his arm strength is diminished and his own recognition of his arm strength is the worst it's ever been. If the Broncos make a run, it'll be because of the defense. The defense beat Baltimore and Kansas City beat themselves.

Nah, I don't smile at injuries. Not unless you get in my face on FB or something about how my team sucks.

If you do that, then I start breaking out the onside kick gifs from last year's playoffs.

I wasn't glad. If they weren't playing the Seahawks I would have been glad. I wouldn't mind any lingering effects now that Green Bay beat the Seahawks

It is a crapshoot, but some players feel more reliable.

I was adressing you because I'm shopping Larry Fitzgerald as a half serious inquiry.

The rest was just a commentary on the commentary that I didnt feel like quoting four people on my phone but failed to paragraph break. It had nothing to do with you aside from an overall general commentary on the first two weeks. Basically saying that all the top rbs haven't done all that well to this point. To be fair the only 1st round guys that have done really well are Gronk and Brown

As for your picks I would have gone the same route getting two stud wrs, then hitting those mid range rbs hard. I usually avoid dez, but thats a preference thing vs an any actual relevent evidence thing. I was high on miller and Gore, so I would have been in the same position as you. Also I'm 0 and 2 too...for different reasons but with better prospects, so even if it was a slight I wouldn't be the one doing the slighting.

Can I have my cookie now?