This is just how it is until we get further clarification.

Don't forget normalview's post.

Do the orange constructs have to be moved the same number of squares as Larfleeze?

95% of the time this won't be an issue if a construct needs to move less as they can take the long way around or go back and forth a square to burn off unneeded movement, but there are cases where they would have to move one square less to reach a specific square.

The simplest example is if a construct is stuck at the end of a linear row of 3 squares (blocked off through various terrain) and he wants to get to the middle square. The only way to get there is if Larfleeze moves an odd number, and to reach the far end Larfleeze must move an even number.

This is a very good question. You can always move in a triangle to turn an even amount into an odd amount.

"you may move any or all Orange Construct objects an equal amount..."

It does not say "up to an equal amount". I would like to see a ruling, but I would say you have to finagle the distance.

Currently, if you outwit Larfleeze's damage SP, all of the constructs go away.
Holy Cow, this is huge. We have been playing that he just can not create new constructs.

Keep in mind that's a huge outstanding question. The rules support what ChiRocker indicated (which is why it's marked the way it is), but the expectation is that the ruling will go the other way.

It has to do with a rule that states that if a power is outwitted, everything brought into the game by that power goes away. This is for things like Smoke Cloud, Barrier, Trigon's Doppelganger and a few others. We, as a community, think the designers did not intend this, but as the rules are currently written, this is how it should be played. We hope it changes, but it is still under deliberation.

I hope they make an exception for this power.

Most likely, there will be an "Objects" clause. Powers like Rampaging Hulk's power come into question along with light objects brought in through Rip It Up.

Rip It Up shouldn't be at issue since the clause only applies to powers and or combat abilities being countered or lost. Not feats.

Then Garth's power.

Well I searched for an answer to my question and couldn't find it so here goes:

By using the "Sargon switch" with one of Larfleeze's constructs so that a character is carrying an orange contruct, and there is now only one other orange construct "on the map", can Larfleeze use just a free action to activate Summon the Orange Lantern Corp power to create a new construct?

Keeping in mind that the carried construct is in the game but now off the map.

I don't imagine he could. The object is still around and should still be countable by his power.

It's around, yes, but is it just "in the game" or is it still "on the map"? I can't find a copy of the full rulebook or the terms glossary. An object cannot be targeted or affected if it is carried but I can't recall if the wording said it's "removed from the map"

This is actually a very good question. I await an answer as well.

The issue of it being off the map has come up with the "can Larfleeze attack/poison through a carried object" was never conclusive, so the judges went with "the objects are not continual... that is the best we can do". This question might help them to make a decision on the issue.