You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
Interesting, potentially useful, nicely-priced Feat if I'm understanding it correctly. It threatemed to give me a headache the first few times I read it. It's almost comically clumsy in its wording.
I showed it to two co-workers (and this is at an engineering firm) and the result each time was a knit brow followed by a laugh. The confusion comes from trying to determine if we're supposed to differentiate between "a target" and "the target", and trying to figure out whether "the action" refers to the earlier attack or the move into a new position. It's almost certainly going to end up being a very clear mechanic, and like any good magic trick it will thereafter seem dreadfully obvious, but coming at it cold... it's terribly written.
Are they letting the Chinese in the factory practice their English by working on some of the game text?
What are you talking about? It's not confusing at all...
Choose a character....say spider-man
After the character resolves a close combat action...after spider-man finishes a close combat action
it may be placed in any square which it may legally be placed adjacent to a target...you may move Spider-man into a square next to one of the targets you made the attack against(Flurry would give you two targets) as long as that space is a legal spac to land in
as the same elevation as the target...and you have to stay on the same elevation as the target you are attacking
The reason it says a target and then THE target is because the second reference is referring to the first...the first is saying A target, one of the targets of your attack...later in the sentence it says THE target because it is referring to the SINGLE target you picked from earlier in the sentence....So you pick A target and then that target becomes THE target...
With the action thing you are really just picking hairs to the max....It is OBVIOUS it means the Close Combat action. Why? well two reasons
1- The move granted to you by the card isn't an action. It never states any sort of action involved in the actual move.
2 - The phrase at the beginning of the sentence makes it clear it is referring to the CC action
3 - In game terms, the person using the card isn't a target in any way shape or form so it couldn't be them.
I think it is written quite fine....
Heroclix 5th Anniversary: Expect Nothing...you won't be as disappointed that way.
Suppose you have this on U Collassal Boy. He has Leap/Climb on the first two clicks, so he qualifies. Could he attack someone from two squares away from the target, then move anywhere else two squares away from the target?
I may have to do this combo just to have a flipping Giant. :D
Interesting, potentially useful, nicely-priced Feat if I'm understanding it correctly. It threatemed to give me a headache the first few times I read it. It's almost comically clumsy in its wording.
I showed it to two co-workers (and this is at an engineering firm) and the result each time was a knit brow followed by a laugh. The confusion comes from trying to determine if we're supposed to differentiate between "a target" and "the target", and trying to figure out whether "the action" refers to the earlier attack or the move into a new position. It's almost certainly going to end up being a very clear mechanic, and like any good magic trick it will thereafter seem dreadfully obvious, but coming at it cold... it's terribly written.
Are they letting the Chinese in the factory practice their English by working on some of the game text?
I'm with you, Miralco. I was an English major and I've read Joyce's Ulysses straight through AND ENJOYED IT and i still find this card confusingly, amusingly worded. If I understand it correctly--and I think that there is an excellent chance that none of us are reading it the way it was intended--its an OK Feat but nothing gamebreaking.
Suppose you have this on U Collassal Boy. He has Leap/Climb on the first two clicks, so he qualifies. Could he attack someone from two squares away from the target, then move anywhere else two squares away from the target?
I may have to do this combo just to have a flipping Giant. :D
Hrmm.
I dunno about the Giant thing.
Man, this game is complicated.
I still haven't managed to try using the 'special objects'. Too much to remember during a game. Whew!
That said, This card makes Combat Reflexes even MORE useful for only 3 points.
I think Veteran Wildchild is gonna be a team staple of mine until everybody's sick of him around here.
I'm with you, Miralco. I was an English major and I've read Joyce's Ulysses straight through AND ENJOYED IT and i still find this card confusingly, amusingly worded. If I understand it correctly--and I think that there is an excellent chance that none of us are reading it the way it was intended--its an OK Feat but nothing gamebreaking.
I agree as well. My confusion over the card centered around what "resolving" meant so I didn't understand who could vault, attacker or defender. Why couldn't they just say "Attacker can Vault when etc..."
I have constant issues interpeting the rules, cards and the language they're supposed to be written in...and believe it or not I teach a course of English Composition at a local community college...of course it is a community college!
Well, it won't work with Pounce (power action that gives a cc attack), but it will work with Charge (and therefore all those powers that work with Charge...EW, BCF, Quake).
Great idea using L/C's cc action option to change elevation after the attack!