I know. Use the rules at your home games, with your friends (assuming you're all in agreement).

In the meantime, while WK/N owns the rights to produce and distribute the game, they have the right to create and print the rules as they see fit. They also have the right to print any errata they feel works with the game. They also have the right to listen and take in to consideration, or outright ignore any suggestions put forward by their players who buy the game.

I'll go get the fire hose... (Who wants a drink from it?)

And that ends this...

Duties? Where is your sense of entitlement?

I was going to post what Puuka already said.

You already have the rights to change the rules as you see fit...at home.

Anyone who goes to play at your house has to play by your rules.

Conversely, anytime you go to play at a WizKids event for WizKids prizes, you have to play by their rules.

Sounds fair.

In truth, you do have a way. Stop buying the product. If enough people do that, then you can make up any new rules you like.

thanks psycho. i need to make my cases a little more air-tight in the future, huh? i'm just trying to protect batman and ollie......

one of the biggest problems my friend always complains about is simply "consistency" if the rulings are consistent with the wording provided in the rule book, then he is ok with it.

dispite the wonky wording when it comes to things like "traits" and "feats" the ruling IS consistent.

it can be true that "Thor and Loki can use Invulnerability" is specifically designed so that their damage reducers cannot be outwitted (and thusly factored into their point cost [theoretically])

the same can be said about Bat-arrow (cuz green-man sounds weird) "Batman and Green Arrow posses the sharpshooter ability" is factored into point cost in that it can be outwitted. the way GD wants it to play is as if they had on their dial.

they already have on their dial, so they cant have it seems really simple...

like it was said in the other thread this "possess vs. can use" arguement has been in place for ever.

allowing bat-arrow to be unoutwittable is making them undercosted. while your at it, allow them to be carried!

i commend you for wantin to protect them, but really GD knows what they are doing...if they wanted them to not be outwitted, they woulda said "used"

This topic is spreading like a plague.

You have the right to remain silent.



You have the right to an attorney.
You have the right to a phone call.
You have the right to be wrong (if you remain silent).
You have the right, and you are a leftist.
You have the right game.
You Grant
You Hefner
It's not an asylum without the inmates

I've left.

Your rights are pretty much how you leave them.

You have the right to purchase product and the right to play the game.

You do not have the right to change a rule that most people can follow within a "sanctioned" event because you feel it is stupid.

If you feel that is stupid then you have the right to play at home with any rules that you want.

I don't even know what ruling we are talking about...

Isn't the "find your fun" house rules philosophy still in effect? Your venue can play how they want, right? There's your player's rights.

we always played that if you crit missed you had to stand on your chair and do the my little tea pot song...