The Damage SP only lets Larfleeze place Constructs on the map. The properties of the Constructs are regulated by the Trait, so as long as Larf has his Trait the Constructs would remain on the map.
I see no reason why you would not be able to do that.
I'd say that Poison damage is dealt once as Larfleeze is the source of all the Poison damage.

Sure but there really is no benefit that i can see.

No since poison only checks to see if your adjacent, same reason why double based characters do not dealt damage twice.

Yes but they are generated by the damage Special Power, the Trait allows them to do something more, but they were still generated by the SP and therefore with the rule they will go away when the SP goes away.

I thought that whenever an object token was caused to be in the same square as another object token, the newly arriving object token was removed from the game.

If I remember that right, then one way to hide from Larfleeze's constructs would be to try to surround yourself with object tokens.

That only happens when an object is dropped on top of another due to losing Super Strength.

No, because the characters are considered adjacent to Larfleeze when he performs these abilities with these orange objects; but they are not adjacent to him they are adjacent to the object. So the orange objects extend his powers, but it is one way, he can do it to you but you cannot do it back to him through his own objects.

Here's an awesome team that could do stupidly well in a 300 point Golden Age constructed game:

Larfleeze + Protected + Alias + Armor Piercing
Rookie Magma x2 (Look like orange constructs)
STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FIELD

= 299

Keep Larfleeze in a room sitting on the SIF and have him just keep pumping out constructs. Keep the room sealed off with barrier from the two "Orange Lantern Constructs" (Magmas)

Every once in a while let some of the item/constructs out to go do your fighting for you and re-seal the wall.

Real Quick:

1.) THIS TEAM IS CONTINGENT ON THE HOPES THAT DAMAGING CONSTRUCTS DOES NOT HARM LARFLEEZE.
2.) I REALIZE THAT SIF IS NOT AS GOOD AS IT USED TO BE, BUT THIS WOULD DEFINITELY KEEP HIM ALIVE LONGER THAN BEING OUT IN THE OPEN.
3.) IT'S A 300 POINT BUILD. TOO BAD, SO SAD COSMIC SPIDEY!

As to his one power, it says they are considered adjacent to him.

He is adjacent, he can poison or punch

It does not say that they both are considered adjacent, just he to them

It says that anything adjacent to a construct object is considered adjacent to Larfleeze for Poison and Close Combat. This means that if an opposing character is adjacent to a construct object 8 squares away from Larfleeze can still make a close combat action/attack against Larfleeze. I don't thinnk it works one-way only.

That's not to mention that historically, the language has never been reciprocal.

For example, the old giant rules stated that giants were considered to be adjacent to figures two squares away for close combat purposes. That didn't mean that the other guy could consider the giant to be adjacent.

Noticed that RA's have peeked their heads in. Just wondering on these two.

Grey Gargoyle: Not sure if the barrier token would protect the objects it was on. Would you still be able to target them if the barrier is on them (Might be something for the RA's to rule on). Also, would it stop them from being able to be moved when Larfleeze is moved?

Nanoarmor: I'm wondering if this would work to absorb the poison damage or attacks made through the Constructs? Another RA question.

Both of these have already been in discussion since earlier this week. They have been sent to GD for answers.


BTW, you forgot to ask if GG's barrier moves with the constructs. (Or if it moves when Arcade moves one.)

Didn`t even think of it, but good to know it`s being considered.

That flurry with multiple lanterns is awesome!!!

Yes, it is one-way. The below explains that: