_______ These are mostly flavour.
_______ If you have any of these then you will win when Nate Sineater is dead.

The second line is interesting as well. I assume if it is a Sineater mafia, it won't have members with alignments across the realms.

I think it's 3 different scenes, but I read it as one on my first read-through.

I read it as one scene, but I might re read.

Starting question:
1. What standards would you suggest for a day 1 lynch, even if you are anti day 1 lynches?
2. What standards (other than guy reads) would you reject for a day 1 lynch?

I'm keeping track of answers on a spreadsheet. Your reluctance or ignore of this question is marked on my scum indicator.

1. I'd be ok to lynch based on refusal to respond to pressure with at very least an affiliation claim - or - an OMAC claim.

2. I'd be unwilling to lynch based on refusal to provide full claim - or - complete silence.

1) Day 1 lynch is mostly instinct, but I'd probably give highest priority to those with no posts.
2) I like this question, but I'm not really sure how to answer it. Nothing comes to mind immediately, but I can't say that I would entertain everyone's reasoning. I mean as I said above Day 1 is mostly gut reads, so who knows what triggers someones gut. If someone can articulate the rationale of their day 1 lynch I can probably support it.

Depending on what the claim is would depend on whether or not I'd want a full claim. A straight up refusal to full claim on Day 1 is understandable, but sometimes you need to.

Hooray for this! Multi-quote is my friend

1. People who are pressured Day 1 and respond without giving any character information should be lynched.
2. People who are pressured but don't say anything at all (it's Day 1, we want better information than that provides) shouldn't be lynched if there are other options. People who claim something important or that gives insight into game structure shouldn't be lynched.

I read it as flashes of a three (potential?) future events.

Red calling someone a traitor
Dragon getting taken down by Ox and co.
Someone calling out for Dreamus

True, there are circumstances where I'd act outside of my given answers. All else equal, those are the basic mental rules I consider.

I don't think I'd ever be 100% comfortable lynching a player for not checking in day 1.

The double lines suggests different scenes, and that appears to be in the future.

What we know:
There is a traitor to the Justice League.

The Ox is opposed to Dragon City.

???

1) Jack. Lynching Jack is my standard. (Like you really expected anything else out of me after he killed me last game and my other killer isn't in this game ) (Or for that matter, like you really expected a serious answer out of me )

2) It would take something pretty convincing to get me on board in the first place, so to be honest I'd probably reject most standards.

I have been away to long! Freedom is good...

With Day 0 it becomes more up in the air for me, but typically I'd be strongly against it. Especially with plurality, there is no absolute reason to lynch a quiet or silent person so early.

Unless they leave one post saying "I think we should let Nate Sineater win, he seems like a cool guy."

1) I'd target low posters (not just in volume, but in content). Then, if someone didn't at least provide a parcel of information once receiving pressure, I'd be willing to go through with the lynch.

2) I'd reject lynching active/cooperative members. I have no mercy for low posters. If you don't want to get lynched, participate. Obviously, Day 1 pressure based on low posts is lesser than later days... but that's why we have day 0.

Now your turn, gfish.