»-Atomic-» - Page 2 - HeroClix Realms

		HeroClix Realms > Games > Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG/OCG > Deck Building
»-Atomic-»

Notices

You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!

If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.

Page 2 of 4

Thread Tools

04/05/2005, 17:45

#16

Dark MyST

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Jan 2004

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

Very good deck! :)
Only these changes...

- Enemy Controller
- Kycoo
+ DD Assailant

I don't like 41 cards...

9.5/10
Good Luck!!

04/05/2005, 19:50

#17

LordKamon89

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Aug 2003

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

Hmm... have to think about those. I like the 3-3-3 thing with the spells, like Ezgil pointed out. Abuse.

2x Kycoo is the only way it's good, if it ever is. 1 is too few and 3 is too many.

1x DD Assailant is inconsistent, and it's not needed here. 3x or 2x is abuse, but only in the right deck; I don't need beatstix in MeTa-Chaos. Kycoo is space-filler and tech.

04/05/2005, 19:59

#18

draco1322003

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Apr 2004

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

this is just a basic beatdwon deck woo hoo it is "old school" with "new School" cards

04/05/2005, 20:03

#19

desolutionist

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Jul 2003

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

It looks like a pretty solid deck. I would just drop the Kycoos for something else. I am not sure what though...Yeah...the Kycoos don't do anything for you in this deck. You should want them to special summon BLS or something cool like that, so you can just steal it with TER.

You should also pack your side deck with some more offensive options. Because right now, it looks 80% defensive.

9.7/10 on the deck

Btw- if my deck is still in in the signature give it a rate?

04/05/2005, 20:07

#20

Cloud9702

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Nov 2002

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

Cool deck but wut metamorphasis for? (not being a idiot but the only metamorphasis card i know is for fusion cards) and i dont see any if you take them out im with dragon king zombrya or archfiend soldier would run this deck

04/05/2005, 20:13

#21

LordKamon89

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Aug 2003

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

Desulutionist: Yeah, Kycoo doesn't do a lot. I'm just trying... there's not a ton of better options. I'm considering something like another Cannon or 2x Reaper... meh, Kycoo gives more offense. As for that matter, Controller can be offensive, and so is Airknight/Black Luster Soldier. But yeah, a lot of defense. :rolleyes:

draco: You are a total n00b, have no skillz, no idea what you're talking about, and aren't worth my time. :tired:

MeTamorphosis is the theme of the deck... you take a Goat/Sinister/Magician of Faith and make it a TER, you morph an Airknight into Balter. You can even make BLS into a Gatling Dragon if you really want to... even using their monsters works. It's a nice card. Archfiend Soldier sux, Skilled Dark Magician is better, and even then, Kycoo pwnz them both. :ermm:

04/05/2005, 20:18

#22

ezgil

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Sep 2004

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

Quote : Originally Posted by draco1322003

this is just a basic beatdwon deck woo hoo it is "old school" with "new School" cards

Yup, those Apprentice Magicians sure can beat you down pretty good.

I love nooobies, they make my day :)

No, not really. I lied. I hate them to death.

Anywho, 2 Kycoos is bleh. I liked the 1 Tomato 1 Newdoria idea, that seems sexy.

04/05/2005, 21:37

#23

LordKamon89

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Aug 2003

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

Thanx0rz, ezgil, you pwn. And I took you up on that fix. 2x Kycoo sided for now.

04/05/2005, 23:26

#24

Cloud9702

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Nov 2002

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

04/06/2005, 02:26

#25

urinalboy

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Jul 2003

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

- vortex (side deck)

+ united we stand

i hate equips, but jesus would an airknight hurt someone with all the stuff you would have on the field.

04/06/2005, 02:35

#26

Vindicated

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Jun 2004

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

«¤ Breaker The Magical Warrior ¤»
«¤ Kycoo the Ghost Destroyer ¤»
«¤ Aprentice Magician ¤»
«¤ Aprentice Magician ¤» - ( ratios for searching are 1:3 and 2:4-5)
«¤ Cannon Soldier ¤» - ( this is tech...keep if u want)
«¤ Critter/Sangan ¤»
«¤ Mystic Tomato ¤» - ( add another tomato for an apprentice... test it atleast..)
«¤ Newdoria ¤»
«¤ Airknight Parshath ¤» - ( 2 tributes in my decks scare the hell out of me... I find i always have a useless tribute in my hand...and 2 is bad top-deckign in gen. )
«¤ Airknight Parshath ¤»
«¤ D.D. Warrior Lady ¤»
«¤ Magician of Faith ¤» - ( i might try 3 myself...but if u get noblemaned your doomed...and evryone is running 2....so good luck)
«¤ Magician of Faith ¤»
«¤ Magician of Faith ¤»
«¤ Tribe-Infecting Virus ¤»
«¤ Sinister Serpent ¤»
«¤ Chaos Soldier ¤»

nice..just thoughts really...

04/06/2005, 17:51

#27

LordKamon89

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Aug 2003

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

It's the bumpazoid... r/f, people. Just do. Notes:

3x MoF = abuse. It's risky, but soooo g0dly when I pull it off, which I did all of last tournament. :cool:

3 tribs, 1 being BLS, is not bad. Look at how much field support I have. Do I look like I'm going to be struggling there? :ermm:

Cloud... totally quit while you're ahead. If you don't understand MeTa, then you're a total n00b, and shouldn't be r/f'ing this in the first place.

As for all the bad topdecks... this doesn't topdeck. It's got so much draw power and speed, it's got huge hands at pretty much all times. The only real problem is the lack of solid s/t removal... I think I might need Dust Tornados or something. Otherwise, it's great, for a cookie.

Hope that cleared some stuff up...

04/07/2005, 03:27

#28

Vindicated

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Jun 2004

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

Quote : Originally Posted by LordKamon89

It's the bumpazoid... r/f, people. Just do. Notes:

3x MoF = abuse. It's risky, but soooo g0dly when I pull it off, which I did all of last tournament. :cool:

3 tribs, 1 being BLS, is not bad. Look at how much field support I have. Do I look like I'm going to be struggling there? :ermm:

As for all the bad topdecks... this doesn't topdeck. It's got so much draw power and speed, it's got huge hands at pretty much all times. The only real problem is the lack of solid s/t removal... I think I might need Dust Tornados or something. Otherwise, it's great, for a cookie.

Hope that cleared some stuff up...

I dont consider bls a tribute because you wont physicly tribute to get him out... and considering I've played agaist this type of deck alot.... unless your playing agaist a n00b you should have atleast some trouble... You can not assume everything will go your way in a duel.... if soemone noblemans a mof you are in a very very bad siduation...u'd have to get airknight on the field...assuming you don't have graceful... and d.d. warrior lady removes herself... so as far as light go... it's kinda counter productive...The ratios I gave you for searchers are tested by me...and they almost assure you will be able to search aroun 95% of the time... but you can ifnore those if you want... I was only trying to make ti more stable.. and incase you care... me as-well as many I know run light of itnervention in theri side-deck... so I would follow my suggestions.... but again, I really don't care if you loose or not...

They were jsut thoughts on your deck and requested to be tested...not bashed.... if all thought are to be ignored and not even tryed...don't ask for them.... :ermm:

04/07/2005, 07:34

#29

LordKamon89

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Aug 2003

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

I respect your pride, and know that I have nothing against you. However, I myself have tested them, I know that there are advantages to 2x Apprentice with 3x MoF, simply for the abilty to put up more of a defense.

Don't think you're the first person to comment on the 3x MoF being a lot. It's just I test, I know it's risky. Not like every NoC going off hits a MoF here, either. 2x Reaper, Sangan, 2x Apprentice, Sinister, DDWL... Ceasefire in there for some protection.

I think those fixes are just fine. I'm just trying some stuff out. And it's my damn deck, so don't spam it if I say no. I choose what fixes I want. PM me if you get mad, that way I can delete it if I don't like it.

Peace. ;)

04/07/2005, 15:35

#30

Vindicated

Member

Offline

Online Status:

Jun 2004

Join Date:

Posts:

0 (0%)

iTrader:

Quote : Originally Posted by LordKamon89

If your trying stuff out...then my comment should not be an issue...and you stating that earlier might have helped a little...

So apparently commenting on your deck and arguring it's cards is spam? Don't post your deck if you don't want people to look at it....That goes on my lsit of dumbest thigns every said...

You may choose what fixes you want...but your be a jurk about it.... I'm going out of my way to to make comments on your deck to help you... if you droped your books at school and I helped you pick your books up just to help.... would you act this same way? of course not... It is people like you that will never ammount to anything... wallow in your ignorance...

Page 2 of 4

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is Off HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Forum Jump

Archive | iTunes