yawn cookie deck use more mechs basically goat/tysomomi deck i read the top sjc decks as well u cant aruge it... its pointless

- all the cookie/control cards
+ an orginal stragey wit some twist pls (suggest mech or beast support)

9/10 on playabity.... it a cookie deck everybody knos it plays well
-9/10 on orginality.... thinkin that it wasnt cookie....thats about it

That looks a lot like calling him a n00b to me...
BTW, there's nothing special about this deck, so stop acting bad please...
I haven't been on these forums for a while, but it looks like even more people have begun to throw Black Luster Soldier in their decks...
I traded mine away because I got tired of thinking of having to put him in my deck...
Anyway, that's all I gotta say...
And never diss the Half Demon, just watch your attitude, you act like every remark against you is a threat to your life or something ...

Peace...

Man this is exactly what im talking about. People who are scared of chaos. People Who think that just because BLS is in the deck means that the deck isnt worth playing. Well i have looked around these forums and there have been plenty of other chaos decks but none of them are getting the abuse for using them like i am. Is it because of my low post count? You think im a n00b? Think im just some random netdecker?

I came to this site in search of trying to get fixes for my deck, not to listen to whinning about how chaos is "unoriginal." And i will quote Kris Perovis on this. "If your opponent knows what your playing by turn 4, its a cookie cutter."

God Damn people get a frigen life. Just give me constructive critisism instead of you being an ### about something that doesnt concern you at all. Grow up.

well u asked for this..... the point is ur deck is cookie and u don't want to admit it.

does this look familar.....

MONSTERS x17

sacred phoenix of nephthys
black luster soldier - envoy of the beginning
jinzo
breaker the magical warrior
apprentice magician x2
kycoo the ghost destroyer
tsukuyomi
airknight parshath
d.d. warrior lady
reflect bounder
magician of faith x2
asura priest
tribe infecting virus
sinister serpent
hand of nephthys


SPELL x17

pot of greed
graceful chairy
lightning vortex
nobleman of crossout
heavy storm
mystical space typhoon
book of moon x2
brain control
snatch steal
metamorphosis x2
scape goat x2
delinquent duo
premature burial
my body as a shield


TRAP X6

mirror force
call of the haunted
sakuretsu armor
torrential tribute
ring of destruction
bottomless trap hole

its a choas deck!!! i kinda appload the guy 4 trying to "tech" in sum cards but its still hopeless the guy will prob put back n the kycoo's and ddwl and stuff...not for the fun of the game.... just cause he think he'll win more

this is wut u are attempting 2 do "tech" in sum good cards then u r trying 2 sary its orginal...

and again i suggest u try mech support or if u want a real challege try using a beastdown support

Did i once say my deck was original?

And OMG its a cookie cutter! Such a big deal that u have to waste your time aguring me about it. All i wanted was some criticism, but apperently people on this site are just to arragent to post on a "cookie cutter"

Also, why the hell would i use mech or beast support in a choas deck.

no reason at all buddy... no reason at alll.... i suggest u browse the forums more cause only a few ppl will actually post on the tread at the deck... gl

If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all.

I like it. 75% of most competitive decks are exactly the same anyways so this is his 25% difference. It looks nice and since you are running 2 Magicians I'd really think about testing IFL for another posible OTK in most cases. It's got quite a bit of differences. Plus IFL gets under Messenger for more abuse of your deck. So you can abuse all of them together giving you more possibilities for abusing making the deck work better in more situation....which is why cookie cutter decks are run. They work well alone or together as does your deck. Nice job.

Thanks for the input. Finally someone who isnt a jerk and who will just give suggestions based on my deck...

I am currently trying to find room for injection. Then it will be tested because i do see your point. Thanks.

What is wrong with u ppl. This is not CCC yet, but it will be. If u have seen a CCC now they dont play NA they play D.D. assailants, blade knights, kycoo,jinzo, airknight, etc. This is pretty much the future of the tsukuyomi control deck. I garantee u in the next shonan jump the majority of chaos will play cybernetic magician and 2 night assailants. This is also by no means inovative or original but he wasent going for that. He has built a good synergetic deck here with almost all the cards working together. Also some of the arguments I heard about this being an OTK was just stupid. By what ur saying that means every single deck in the game of yugioh that has any sort of win condition is an OTK. WRONG!!! and ppl braging about their 7 years of experiance. unless u played the game before it came out in the states then u dont have 7 years of experiance.now on to the fixes

- MOP( although the stalling to gain card advantage is good it dosent seem to work in here very well, so 1 is enough as long as u play swords i cant remember if it was on the deck list)

+ back to square one/monster reincarnation

for some reason not a single person that has seen my tsukuyomi abuse deck seems to like back to sqaure one. I think it is one of the most advantagous cards in the game if u can get around its cost with NA or sinister serpent. I also chose it instead of wing blast because u dont have mask of darkness in ur deck to reuse it even though its better. but if ur like everyone else and dont like btso then go with monster reincarnation.

another one but ur proly not gonna agree with me

- 1 cyber magician( i dont know 2 just seems like to much to me)

+ airknight parshath( gains u card advantage and owns goats)

Thanks For the input.

So far, i havent gotten any big chance to test this deck. But will being doing it asap. And i understand about Back to Square One. Although the next spell before BtS1 is Brain Control. All of which will be tested and i will give you my results soon enough.

As for Airknight, i love him. But Cybernetic Magician is so good to abuse. But i Will try the 1:1 Ratio AK/Cm. If that works better, then the change will go in. Thanks.

This will not be most Cookie Cutter decks, but some. Most will still prefer Airknight due to trample and card draw power which is usually better unless you have the stuff to make Magician abusable with Sinister or 2 Nights in play. So some of the time it may even be better, but more often I would guess it will hurt. I'd run one personally, but not in this deck. It is built to abuse it so it will probably play better like this than just switching one Magician for 1 Airknight. If you do remove 1 MoP and a few other changes which a side deck can certainly bring in then Airknight would be a great sideboard.

MoP probly will come out. As of right now im thinking of BoM instead. To abuse my flips more.