exactely my thoughts, playing tournaments isn't really a game anymore !
melee is going down the drain with multiple F/L attacks and úberbound.

corphy and his *UBER* bound ...
:( ......

*Steers thread back on topic*

I don't really like the idea all that much. Chargers already have a definite advantage, they don't need more help.

NOT in Rebellion. Can you imagine 3 Bounding Scorpem Gunnners? "Chain";) Lightning is already a problem, now you get multiple F/M'ers bounding the tar outta you. Uberbound... I'm not gonna get into it.

Maybe Conquest, but the "rules" really seem like they were chosen from a hat.

How about allowing bound/charge in formation with the +1/+1 but optional attack SAs are turned off? Kind of hard to get that F/L gun in line or that WM attack lined up with the other mounts moving with you????

Could also have the attacks made through printed front arc? well.... maybe the front arc thing would be too big a pain in the keister for game play.


oh well, its 4am and I need to have more coffee to get the brain awake :p

it would be nice to have formation charge though :)
think of it ... charge can always be found on medieval/fantasy combat :)

correct if I'm wrong but should the target of a (close combat or ranged) combatformation not be one figure?

So what is the problem with a charge or bound formation?

example

in an ordenary KI melee unit a 7 point recruit gives you +1 damage and +1 attack
in a charge melee unit you need a 28 figure to do the same.

The only thing that could be unbalancing would be a non unique multible arrow bounder or a 5again non unique) sweep/charger.