I would prefer 3 just so we have more time to play with each set. It seems some teams just comletely get bypassed when they could become better with more development time. Secret Society, Kang, Manhunters, Underworld. None of those were real bad teams, they were just overshadowed by some of the others.

There was potential there that never really got explored in the metagame. Of course though we probably have to stick with 4 just because it needs to be 2 marvel and 2 dc a year.

4 Sets a Year.
4 PC's a Year.
Win Win

UDE cannot do 3 sets per year!

I would love it with 2 standard 220 card sets one of each. Then 2 smaller sets one of each for just legacy content.

liessss child lock can beat agl if it gets lock early and mitt and it savagely rapes glock and probly even beats titans (this is a matchup i havnt tested really) and it auto beats anything that has no disruption whatsoever to child lock aka almost every team ever made cept for like doom. i personally think its 1 of the top decks right now, but for some reason people arnt playing it.

aijfpij i agree with SS and KINDOF kang.(for a small team at least) but manhunters and underworld are just plain horrid. 5/7 5 drops 4tw.

IMO 4 is too much. 'Course, If I ONLY played/collected vs, it would be just fine. But the thing is I don't, I also collect/play heroclix which has 3 or more sets a year. HOWEVER! I would LOVE to see an indy set. Savage Dragon, Freak Force, W.I.L.D.C.A.T.S., Youngblood, Witchblade, Tomb Raider, :cheeky:

I only feel sorry for collectors, non-collectors really only have marginal reason to complain.

I have no problem with the release schedule. The most exciting time for me is when a new set is released or is gearing up for released and we get to see a wad of new shiny cards. This was tarnished with X-Men by the spoiler shenanigans, but I have high hopes for Infinite Crisis.

Can you tell we don't get many big events over here?