Well haven't we already been over this issue in like 5 megathreads?

Has anyone actually changed their opinion?

Also, although I understand what you're trying to do, having people not voice their arguments on something like this is a hard thing to ask.

Poorly worded thought process. My bad. I was just sort of wondering out loud that if there is a far greater majority of people that don't want the card around (and I freely admit that there may not be, sorta the whole point of this thread) than there are of those who do, what's keeping UDE from banning it?

I don't want any part of another round of this. Suffice it to say that the vote may be closer than you think.

Also, since we generally know people's viewpoints (and why) on this subject already ... we've been over this how many times? ... might a better question be, rather, "does the recent shift in the demographic of VS away from the Pro Scene make Enemy MORE ban-able or LESS ban-able?"

Because, at least in my opinion, that's the only thing that would really be different - and I would think it actually gives more reason not to ban it.

I don't know about anyone else, but I intend to stick with this game as long as I have local people to play with. But if UDE starts bowing down to pressure to ban cards just because some subset of the remaining players doesn't like them, that will be the final straw for me.

Banning Enemy isn't going to bring back the PC Circuit in all its former glory, and it's not going to bring casual players into the stores in droves. It would make some existing players happy, and some furious, me among them.

If you don't like Enemy of My Enemy, don't play it. Enough already.

You're right. I just thought people would have gotten tired of voicing their opinions by now and could manage a simple yes or no. But I can clearly see that was a bad idea. Closing thread now.