You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
I have to wonder if DC regrets brining him on. The idea of Krypton being destroyed by the inhabitants hubris is much more appealing than it being engineered by a villain.
I have to wonder if DC regrets brining him on. The idea of Krypton being destroyed by the inhabitants hubris is much more appealing than it being engineered by a villain.
I have to wonder if DC regrets brining him on. The idea of Krypton being destroyed by the inhabitants hubris is much more appealing than it being engineered by a villain.
The cynic in me says that depends entirely on the sales. If people are buying the comic in high enough numbers, they probably don't care what damage he does to the Superman mythos.
ASK ME ONCE I’LL ANSWER TWICE JUST WHAT I KNOW I’LL TELL BECAUSE I WANNA!
SOUND DEVICE AND LOTS OF ICE I'LL SPELL MY NAME OUT LOUD BECAUSE I WANNA!
you all making judgements without reading the ending should go eat your hats.
He WAS Kyrptonian in the end, and it was fantastic reveal.
him being kryptonian doesn't change that they changed it just to change it. the who may still be kryptonian, but it's the why that matters. it was a story of hubris, of their machinations precipitating it and their arrogance to refuse to acknowledge the cries of the prophet. and then they were destroyed by something beyond them, the hubris of man brought low by the irresistible powers of nature. classic stuff that. parallels to atlantean myth
if it's a dude doing it, even a kryptonian dude, it undoes the story's strength