Dammit, I did mean levity!

Fine. What are people trying to do in response to people like Masenko, Realik, etc?

I agree with the first paragraph. That is the kind of argument that I would have preferred to see dominate this thread.

All I have been trying to do is point out the actual facts to quell the tide of hyperbole that has dominated this thread. As was pointed out, I have done very little actual arguing.

I compare the value that I get for the points,
Resource or Relic or ATA - it doesn't matter,
I ask myself if it is points well spent.

If you are saying the Eye and Cube are "roughly equivalent"
then we can no longer debate.

I will never ever play the Cube.
Even if there was no Eye I wouldn't play the Cube.

Yes it is 50% to pick up, but it only gives 2 'bonuses'
and there is a 1 in 3 chance you drop it for rest of game
each time you use it.

The Eye gives 4 'bonuses' and you keep it.

It is no Belt, but it is a cool way to spend 12 points
in those games where Gauntlet/Belt is banned
or you don't want to play them.

Here's a good comparison: Sting and Orcrist.
What.

Fair question.

Personally, I'd settle for a little more complaining about the ruling and a WHOLE LOT LESS personal attacks, comparisons to abusive relationships and assorted tinfoil hat conspiracy bull####.

That a fair enough answer for you?

I would feel bad saying otherwise after all the work you went through...

Kids are in bed, wife's watching Stargate SG-1. I had some free time. And I speed-read.

The problem isn't the ruling*, it's everything surrounding it. This includes people, who are getting attacked because in the eyes of some people, they messed up. There's no conspiracy or tinfoil hat stuff, they're just doing a bad job.


* - Exception: Noh-Varr. There's a serious problem with that ruling.

Having said that, holding people responsible for their actions isn't necessarily a personal attack. And it seems obvious to me some shenanigans were involved, just going but what's been presented.

Says who? You? How do you get the right to make that call?

I've seen and heard all that you have and I still have seen ZERO evidence of "shenanigans".

And even if there were, that is for WK to address, not us.

WE. ARE. NOT. TECHG0D'S. BOSS.

Holding people responsible and disagreeing with a ruling is one thing. But looking over the quotes that Psychohippie rounded up, it went way beyond that. Multiple times.

And I expect I missed a couple...

I am the consumer buying WK's product. As a consumer, I demand a better job. I am just in a position this time to be able to identify a particular piece of the "machinery" that lead to this particular "product disappointment."