You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
Finishing dinner with friends and getting ice cream. I'll share scum reads later.
So typical: I name JoH as my biggest read and he reciprocates. Funny how he took me off the possible day 1 lynch pool. I'm sure he'll counter with something like it would be too obvious to include me.
Finishing dinner with friends and getting ice cream. I'll share scum reads later.
So typical: I name JoH as my biggest read and he reciprocates. Funny how he took me off the possible day 1 lynch pool. I'm sure he'll counter with something like it would be too obvious to include me.
Wouldn't it be more typical for me to counter with "Three players have stated you are their top scum read" "I already said you were a slight scum read (reason 1) and you've since given me reason 2" or "of all players I'm willing to give a pass on Day 1 even with a slight scum read, you are generally at the top of the list"?
I'd just like the record to show that the Lamplighter discussion is about 5% me asking Jack if he's Lamplighter and him declining to answer and 95% people knocking me for it and me defending my reasoning. I'm tired of addressing it, so this will be the last time I comment on it unless I'm getting lynched because of it, which would be dumb so let's not do that.
Problem is, this might be a bad game to try and get people to do that for the first time. Hybridity games are always mechanically crunchy and full of flavor, and then if this is structured anything like the last game reads aren't really helpful because a) mafia doesn't k ow their teammates and b) once somebody dies and changes characters your reads on them becomes worthless. Less than, in fact, because of the anchoring effect (you're likely to start your new read of them in the same place as the old one, even though there's no real reason to).
Well, you can be tired of it but it's still rather odd that you outright asked someone on D1 if they were the anti-Big Bad (as far as I can tell from the story). Getting defensive over it means you either don't understand why it was a shady question or feel indignation is a defense. The fact you had one person, in particular, defending you - or maybe they were just being anti-JoH - doesn't help your case.
(And JoH, I don't really get if that pic you used was meant as an eye roll at me or at the bizarre hang-up people have on trying to hunt down the JL despite indications it's better if they remain secret for now).
"Nobody important? That's amazing. You know, in 900 years of traveling time and space I've never met someone who wasn't important."
Quote : Originally Posted by Ricosan95
Quote : Originally Posted by Originally posted by Rokk_Krinn
Wouldn't it be more typical for me to counter with "Three players have stated you are their top scum read" "I already said you were a slight scum read (reason 1) and you've since given me reason 2" or "of all players I'm willing to give a pass on Day 1 even with a slight scum read, you are generally at the top of the list"?
This is another scummy post. I think you are trying to get me vigged.
This looks like you are keeping track of who has given me as a top scum read. The actual answer is cbob, vlad, killingjoke and you.