This was my very first time attending any big event like this and if they do it in Maryland again, I'd attend again. Things were done slightly different than I would have done things but I wouldn't call it disorganized. Mostly, when a problem came up, I saw it resolved. There were things I saw that I don't agree with (The ZA tournament prob, for one), but again, I say things went smoother than some people let on.

How did a judge rule against that? How did your opponent even think that that needed to be ruled on? Doesn't Lex specifically state that he can't be outwitted unless its an adjacent character or something???

RIGHT UNDER THEIR NOSES: Lex Luthor begins the game with a Subterfuge token on his card. When Lex Luthor has a Subterfuge token on his card, opposing characters can only target him if they began the turn adjacent to him. When Lex Luthor targets an opposing character with an attack, remove all Subterfuge tokens from his card.


I think it's cut and dry if dragon put the token on the card!

That's a good point and pretty standard practice for conventions. This makes me wonder if at this specific convention, the other games had the same issues. I don't think you can compare this convention to Gencon/Dragoncon/Origins (which probably also have issues across the board).

If I was on other forums comparable to this one for other games, I wonder if I'd find the same problems?

I think it was a Sidestep/Outwit, actually.

True but side step free action on your turn which means not adjecent at beginning of your turn in my mind but I don t even think that's how Dragon said it went down.

When you are criticizing how much the disorganization affected your enjoyment of the event, then yes, the cash is a stupid thing to bring up because it doesn't support his point at all. And what he said in another post about someone making a run for the cash is even idiotic. How far would anyone get. The tables were in the way of any money and there were usually two employees at those tables at any time. If someone had a weapon, sure, but then they could have stole the lock box just as easily (it's easy to get in to. Not like its a safe). But regardless, if anything happened to the money, its on the employees and volunteers. It has no effect on anyone else so, again, its an idiotic thing to complain about.

Even if that is what they did, I don't see a problem with it.
Vandalism? I don't think that word means what you think it means...
Cause clearly it matters if people impress you, not if they win the event...
Never heard this before. Heard some people say that he was supposedly rude, but I never hread anyone say anything about him cursing at anyone.
How so?
Math disagrees with you. 32 players means 8 2-0 records after 2 rounds, which will automatically get into top 16, and then the top scoring 8 players with 1-1 records will as well. Even with up to 64 players, all undefeated players after 2 rounds would be in the top 16, because math.
Chris who? I thought the RA now was Charlie, aka Laenan

It indeed does mean what I think it means.

No, it doesn't. Vandalism means deliberately damaging or destroying property. Contacting a company about a customer service issue is definitely not that.

*Sigh*

The property I'm referring to is a page meant to market their product. That page is their billboard.

So you'll be taking Batarang's spot on Team Hello Kitty?

And no damage is being done to it. It's still there, and just as functional as before.

You have no idea how big a smile this put on my face. It's a marathon, not a sprint...

Here's another condescending *sigh*