Yeah, the post is in the Judges forum. The transcript is pretty much what scholarx has already posted - it's nbperp's answer to the old "can I use Phasing with the multi-attack?" question.

I'll start a thread on the Judges forum and ask about this issue specifically - seems I am not the only one with a diverging opinion, after all.

TK option 2 is an attack so that argument makes no sense to what people are discussing here.

I do not know what other people are talking about... I am discussing moving a friendly figure or an object to a new square, neither of which involves an attack roll.

Someone said something about TK option 2, which would be the toss objects at someone power.

I respectfully disagree with what you believe that line implies. For instance - do you have to make an attack roll when you target an object, square of blocking terrain, or wall? Can you target those things during a Multi-attack? It would seem that underlined part more likely implies attacks that don't require rolls.
...Truthfully, I think you missed the part that should really be emphasized in that line of text:
Also:
Don't these lines seem to infer to everyone that it's attacks you should be making?

The best I can really do here is go back to that Judge thread and request that nb consider an update to the FAQ/E&C (and perhaps the next rulebook) specifically stating that non-attack actions can't be used for multi-attack (which is obviously how he and GD understand the 'trait' to work in the first place).
Personally, I don't know why P/T, Regen. and Support were cherry-picked and specifically mentioned as the powers that shouldn't be used with it (after all, no colossal has Support, only Dark Phoenix has Regen., and only Spectre and now AM have Phasing). Perhaps these were in response to the burning-up-the-boards multi-attack questions of yesteryear, and therefore the FAQ, etc. documents were updated to end that discussion... can't say I know for sure.

I have already started a thread on the topic on the Judges forum, feel free to chime in. I haven't gotten around to requesting it to be incorporated into the E&C yet, simply because I want to see what the answer is first...
My guess (which of course fits well with my view that you should be able to use Barrier etc with the multi-attack) is that those three powers were cherry-picked as they were deemed too powerful to be allowed to be used with multi-attack. But that is of course mere speculation.

Well, that was quick.
I've also seconded scholarx's request that this should be clarified further in the E&C.

Actually on my LoSH PAC Telekinesis Option 2 says:

Guess you messed it up with TK option 3

You're totally right, I gotta admit I didn't think about attacks targeting walls/objects/blocking terrain.

Which completely invalidates my earlier post.

*mocks himself*

That being said, I do accept the rule as it is, it just didn't seem consistent to me, and I kinda needed to express that.

Thanks for clearing up my view here, monsieur.

*wondering why there isn't a :humble: smiley*

That was what I thought as well.