It looks a lot more like quake than PW to me.

Hellfire Club: Inner Circle can keep doing actions without action tokens while the White King is showing on the asset dial, unless they are facing Excalibur of course.

also eva does she get two action tokens when pushed and returning or not


Im most concern with what the ruling/errata on wolverine will be

My stake in this race of errata lies with Mojo. I want one of my favorite comic characters to at least resemble something playable.

Oh, and Havok, who discharges all over himself and his friends.

So Iceman only attacks once against all adjacent to a marker placed opposing. No printed damage with the attack just one or 2 based on the action total plus 1 potential pushing.

White king can heal while off the map, but people were saying he basically gets healing factor still even when he comes back to the map after 'dying' which is not the case. Sure he can regen back up, but he doesn't free heal 1 once he's back on the map. Only happens when he's off.

Shadow King can heal multiple times with his defense power, pushing, crit miss, flurry, mystics.

Thanos does not stop white king from healing off the map

So I see this now after re-reading the rulebook on replace then modify. It doesn't seem to follow through logically, but it isn't worded logically, so its a moot point. However, even in this case, Mikhail is still able to reach then other side of the map, so i guess it really doesn't matter.

Also, I don't think it would require an errata on mikhails part, but rather a closer look at the rules regarding replacing values. In 10 cases out of 10 it has never been an issue, but then a new character is released that creates a corner case, and the whole standing rule needs reworked. This is exactly why i stay out of the rule forums these days. (This thread was started in general discussion.)

that wasnt the intent at all...

I totally agree that Deathlok needs to kill each opponent twice.

So let a teammate strike the killing blow!

Frankly I find these comments offensive. No one is "rules lawyering" or refusing to acknowledge intent. You play by what the rules say, not what you "think they really meant'. If what they actually say isn't the intent, you need to fix the text to match the intent, not ignore what it really says because "I'm pretty sure they didn't mean that". Wolverine and Mikhail are both cases where the rules are clear, we just don't know if they match the intent. Iceman and White King are cases where the text isn't clear so you have to get a clarification. EVA is a reflection of a standing rule that has been uniformly applied and is now being reconsidered. If someone wants to point out the "rules lawyering" specifically I'll be happy to look.

To be fair, it's the rules culture and those enforcing the rules that have encouraged this. There's abundant documentation stating that 'intent' don't mean ####.

Re: Kid Omega, I don't mind one way or the other this ruling [as I can see clearly the reading of it in either way, and given current GD's druthers, it's no surprise they 'intended' the more powerful interpretation] but now I feel absolutely no shame in using Radagast [as if I ever did] 'cause this is like him but easier to use.

updated and updating first post to reflect this threads new station

I can't wait to use Kid Omega with my 3 Big Berthas!

"Bring the Flab-O-Cannon online Quentin."

I think they've done a pretty good job of answering these current rules issues so far.

Actually no, it does not say "while off the map". And while its since been clarified that this was the intent it needs to be put into words to be official.