I believe there is a misunderstanding here.

Chaos/Scientist is a way to say 'Chaos or Scientist'. I did not mean for it to be considered a hybrid Chaos and Scientist deck.

My definition of 'Cookie Cutter' is very precise. It is, in escense, a specific way to build a deck.
Unoriginal, however, is the act of building a deck very similar to others. But it DOES NOT HAVE TO BE EXACTLY THE SAME.

For example, taking someone elses deck concept and altering it to make it your own. Original is a deck type that's based on something people would not normally consider. Weither it be because they aren't good concepts, or people just haven't thought of them yet.
I'm sorry, but Scientist and Chaos monsters kill any originality in any deck.... Simply because so many people use them.

Also, i apologize for the late reply, but i actually have a life to attend. ^_^
Please don't be angry at me for all this. This just spiraled out of control and don't like to make enemies. I don't hate the people, i just hate the cards.

MMDANiel- or what ever your name is. You just contradicted your self bro and open a can... well you know what. I can say ur theory deck is unorignal because ur un book of moons cuz every one else runs em an dthat ur deck is cookie cutter, or that u run pot of greed ur deck is cookie cutter. Or ur burn deck sux and is totaly unorignal because u have well burn cards in there and thats considered cookie cutter. one or two cards bro dont make a deck unorignal or cookie cutter so think b4 u shove ur foot in your mouth. juju keep it up brah and hope you had a good christmas

dam, he sounds l337! ;x

juju, this deck is sex. i believe i posted on it already at pojo (;P) so u no my opinons. later, biatch.

shmoonoffman: I'm sorry if i'm annoying to you.

VashDaStampede: Thank you for doing your research. I was wondering when someone would do that. Yes, my decks all suck. I never claimed to be a good deck builder, which is why i posted them on here. But obviously, no one was willing to touch them.

Did i say my Defense Theory deck was original? I apologize if i did. I was certainly wrong is stating them.

As for my Pyro Burn, well, i came up with that before anyone else. I know i have no proof behind it. I suppose you will just have to trust me. lol. Yeah, like that'll ever happen, right?

Alright, i'm going to swallow my pride and try to solve this. I really don't want to waste any more space.
I was in a very PO'ed mood when i posted that original post (this is what all these posts are concerning, right?). I had seen several decks containing Chaos monsters and/or Magical Scientist before this one.......and they irk the living crap outta me.
Rationalizations aside, it was wrong of me to post while in such an annoyed mood. It clouds my judgement often.

Even though i recognize such cards can be used in ways that aren't 'evil', i still see them as such. Now, lets agree to disagree and move on, shall we?

Hate me, like me, whatever. Do what you want. It's obvious the mob mentality has kicked in and i'm going to be wrong and seem like a jerk no matter what i say.
So, gibelty-gobelty-goo.

Yeah... obviously he's YamiJake. Deemer isn't 1337. My deck makes him cry.