Same with me. I also disliked very much the fact that one of the very few questions I wasn't able to give my own answer was the one about choosing a scult to reuse. In court I believe that's called "leading a witness", in other words steering the outcome of the question. Other than that I truly enjoyed the survey and am thankful for the chance to share my thoughts. Thanks to all who worked on it and put it into action.

Afterthought: Perhaps my real answer for the sculpt reusing question isn't available since it's already being planned to be reused. Since we can't know what's already planned for that, any answer that anybody gives is an uninformed and thus invalid answer, "I'll take door #2, Monty!" :)

interesting survey, i just hope they can use the data...and i got to fill in the blank about how horribly broken the SSw Arrow IV is! hope they listen!

Well, if they do get rid of some of the "splinter factions" I hope they bring back their original clans like the wolves and Nova Cats. This survey was very well done, thought out, and done. Kudos to those who were involved with it, they took the concerns of the players. Also, what they think are the major concerns of the game itself like the problems with artillery and tank drop and what they would do to fix it, maybe we will be heard and the game can be saved from what it has become.

This survey was excellent, and it got right to the point.

I chose the Vulture to re-release. It's an iconic 'Mech, with only two examples so far, both of which bite.

(The Ryoken II is the only one similarly underrepresented for its age, and both of them are pretty slick, despite being similar factions and point costs to the Vultures.)

The point I tried to get across, especially with "extra comment" questions, was that the "uselessness" proportion of each booster is why I don't buy many anymore, nor do I plan to. The rules still make it so that 99% of the pieces are a waste, and the other 1% are the only competitive ones. And that's simply unacceptable if the boosters cost $10 and give only 4 units.

In fact, I wish they'd had more options for that question; like we could pick the number of pieces of each type and it calculates booster price based on that. I'd have liked to see an option where not every booster contained a 'Mech, which could make 'Mechs rarer, and thus each 'Mech more powerful.

The game's in a sorry state right now because they're treating rarity and competitiveness like they would in a CCG, and they have to realize that when pieces don't get "special rules" (Cards' text, in a CCG, overrule the games rulebook where they conflict) there's no way to make a "lesser piece" (worse, for same points cost) worthwhile. Which means that most of the boosters we buy contain junk -- more so when set retirement hits.

They need to have special rules on different pieces, but there was no question asking about that.

I had the same problem. MW is the only game I play and I've never played any of the others. I just chose to mark a game that I thought might be cool. But that was a relatively minor problem with the survey, I think.

I was really glad for the opportunity to push for faction purity benefits and for completely removing artillery from this game. How can artillery be practical on a battlefield that is less than 2 football fields long? Artillery out, Mechs in!

Thanks for the survey WK!

Excellant survey, and it really goes to the heart of the issues with MW today. I replied in favor of the importance of factions, storyline, and adjusting the rules with the aim of making 'Mechs the kings of the battlefield again. If they follow through with some of the concepts floated in the survey, they will probably succeed in revitalizing the game and boosting sales figures.

I am a skeptic for everything, but this survey was great, and really seems like they are asking questions to go in the right direction.
Can you take this more than once?
Or can different persons in a household take it?
Like many others I expressed a big problem with the poor playability of mechs, and the overpowering of Artillery.
I picked the Atlas for remake, because it's just such a cool mech, and a Non Atlas would be great.
I don't see why they think there is anything they could do to get people to buy packs vs. Singles. Packs are a lottery for the blind who like to take bad risks. Singles are for the reasonable who like to get what the pay for.
Well here's to hoping they improve.
SJ4

Darn won't let me edit. Well, I sure hope they address making Mechs stonger, as well as the importance of Faction purity. Those are two aspects of CBT that most want to see implemented anyway.

so far nothing but love for the newest survey by everone so far, I am just wondering when the warpoggers are going to come in and give their 2 cents worth and then turn around and sell it on ebay for $20.

I took the time to fill it out and at the end while considering my respose (maybe 1 1/2 min.) the page timed out. Oh well!

I really wish i could see the results of this survey. Nice job WK, glad you asked.

Since it wasnt listed. I want to see the Madcat III back, as well as the Warhammer.

if i could change one thing... at that enswer i wanted to type *few* things... and survey crashed, so i had to fill in questions again.

since i dont want to feel i typed my reponse to that question in vain, ill just poste it here.


well here is my reponse to what i would change if i had a chance do change one thing :)

doh :( i posted the *un-spellchecked-version*, i alologize for all the typos.

Great Survey.

I would like to have selected the Hellstar for a return - it was a pity that our options were limited.