even tho you kindof contridicted your self there i will still come up with a half reasonable reply

i am being polite, i am giving you valid info. if you think fatality is good against AGL period, then good luck. if you think having shocker in your deck makes the matchup in your favor cus you can stun chomin GOOD LUCK. i couldof simply just gone with the wrong flow and said YEAAA SHOCKER IS A BEAST AGAINST AGL NO WORRIES THERE or i could be realistic and say the truth which involves no he doesnt do enough to put the matchup in your favor.

i just find it ridiculous that people just ASSUME stuff. its 1 of my pet peeves i guess. like people think if you run a curve deck with 4 mikado you beat agl or something. they also think if you dont hit chomin theres no way you can win at all. (also NOT hitting chomin is almost impossible consider u mull for him and you have 4x ring)

for some reason i always have to correct stuff i cant be like most other good players and just giggle to myself :( AND SORRY THAT IM NOT ALL JOLLY ABOUT IT.

The most F'd up kind. (Panthers win!)

From the Miami Herald:

Forward Nathan Horton reenergized the crowd by getting into a slugfest with Craig Adams. After a number of hard punches, Horton eventually pulled Adams' helmet off and began beating him with it, which got Horton extended time in the penalty box. Horton received a two-minute minor for instigating, five for fighting and a 10-minute misconduct.

After the game, Horton said the helmet incident was accidental, and he hoped he wouldn't get suspended for it. A fine, however, is likely.

You don't have to, you want to. You are an attention #####, just like me. One big difference? I don't spit off short opinionated comments with no capitals and poor spelling, pretending to be an expert. I can always be wrong, most times I am. I always admit that. You always make it sound like you are the smartest player on earth and any opinion that does not agree with yours is the stupid. Your attitude is the stupid. You don't help as much as you think you do, with an attitude like yours people tend to ignore whatever you say anyway.

You know, I was contemplating whether I should reply to this. Even though I understand that further responding to you will only lead to further postings, I could not resist using my mouse. Realize that I do not want to derail this thread with my personal misgivings, so I've decided to make this my last post aimed at you.

Your whole post reminds me of something that happened to me a long time ago.

I had an English class with a black guy. Said black man and I did not get along in class. One day we started talking some racist stuff - something about blacks and fried chickens, white people and cheese, and asians and rice - and we got into a brawl in class. Nothing big, but anyhow we hit each other a few rounds and became pretty good friends subsequently. It was always real cool we chilled, hung out whatever.

One year later, this guy's batting for the other team and is trying to get me to... pitch for him. He has proceeded to do so for about as long as I can remember. We are unfortunately no longer friends because all our conversations somehow subsequently end with him saying: "When are you gonna let me do it?" While I am okay with homosexuals, I am not too cool with borderline sexual harassment.

So you see, it's nothing to be ashamed of to admit that you are in fact "digging me". Your attempt at instigating me into some sort of fight is clearly identical to the situation with my black friend's attempt to get me to sleep with him. You two guys aren't the first either - just the most obvious. I call this brand of homosexuality - as it does in fact relate to you - "Ghettogay". I have often heard it refered to as "Gay-Z" and "G-Unit" and other terms not appropriate for this website.

You see when a masculine homosexual - or a poser in the case of you Mr. E-tough/E-sexy/e-smart/e-cool - is attracted to another man - or when he is "ghettogay" or a "Gay-Z" - he generally cannot accept revealing this because he simply cannot allow himself to look bad - or unmasculine - in society. He has a masculine image he wants to upkeep and if he were to give in to his passions, society would frown upon him and he would lose his masculinity in the eyes of society at large. This fact is even more accentuated when said other person is also a masculine person. Should he be rejected when he expressess his affection with said individual he is left with neither his reputation or his love. So what happens?

The instigating party attempts to subjugate the other party through some sort of domination. Highly similar to the phenomenom of girls making out when they are in a cat fight - frequently spoken of though never documented. See Wild Things to watch the creatures in their natural habitat - the instigating party tries to impress some sort of passion upon the other side generally through some sort of physical combat mostly Greco-Roman wrestling. This idea is on the basis that anger leads to violence, violence leads to lust, and lust leads to passion.

I think if we look at your history this very well sums up what you are doing. Unfortunately, neither men and women get angry at trolls. We just stomp on them and laugh at them.

BTW since you are inevitably going to bring up some point that I made a long post about homosexuals or how I am so knowledgeable about then, please re-read the above portion. Here let me quote it for you in case you can't deduce things well:

"One year later, this guy's batting for the other team and is trying to get me to... pitch for him. He has proceeded to do so for about as long as I can remember. "

Obviously, you become fairly adept at a subject when you are exposed to it for long periods of time.

If you so intelligently ask "Gee, Paul maybe this is a sign from God/Allah/Vishnu/UDE/whatever that you are [blank]." I would respond by saying that I am sure there are lots of gay guys after Brad Pitt... but he is only PIITBing Angelina Jolie.

By the way, no one PIITB trolls.

Your definition of barn is strange. I make one thread about Roy St. Clair and I'm a barn?

Wow.

I thought I was a Jason Hager barn dude. I 'barn' New School every single other post I make. Go do a post search. I think everyother post is either "I love New School" or "Play New School." I - and suppose the realms community at large - would understand me barning Hager or whatever. But Roy St. Clair? Wow, you know I hear they're playing Brokeback Mountain on IMAX in San Fransisco.

There. I'm done with my spiel. You sir can take you and your insecurities - which are obvious with each post you make somewhere else.

As for the Faces matchup... yeah.

I've always pictured you as some type of pacifistic, all-loving, orange tie-dye toga wearing hippie.

And here it turns out that you are one of those blood-lusting, hockey-watching, beating-a-man-with-his-own-headgear hippies.

Talk about a paradigm shift. ;)

Best of both worlds, wouldn't have it any other way.

(Paul, trolliltootiesFTDQ is not gonna be able to follow your arguement. You used proper punctuation, grammar, and spelling. Those capital letters throw him off too. Just shoot him a bird maybe.)

lol..UDE?

Ummmm...TheDerangedBear wins the thread.

As far as FOE VS AGL, I'd say that Mikado is the best possible tech for FOE (even though it doesn't guarantee a win). Stunning your oppoent's Chomin and then forcing them to make a choice between stunning their Xallarap or having ti get KOd BEFORE Xallarap attacks, is awesome.

indeed. of course i could start start taking the few seconds to bother with the above.. but thats just silly! and my spelling isnt too horrible? IS IT? i dont see whats the difference between taking time to do the above and not doing the above. its not like i turn into a smarter person somehow just because i do the above. you may percieve me as smarter if i do but honestly there is no point in the long run. most ppl spell check it up.. i dont. now dont tell me you are SMARTER if you click the spell check button.

GJ on taking a decent ammount of time to respond to a "troll" ;/

i will just say.. yes lets assume im gay. im still 100% positive this gay man has gotten more ##### than u will probly get in your whole life considering you dont all of a sudden turn rich :(

BUT THAT DOESNT MEAN YOU ARNT A GREAT GUY!

and if im a troll i must be 1 of the 1s with gems on their belly buttons that all the females wanted =)

Argh... Can't.... help... myself...

You do realise that ranting about how many women you've slept with after someone has questioned your sexuality makes it seem like you're gay, don't you?

I'm not trying to get drawn in here, I'm just putting forward an idea for you to think about.

Can someone tell me where on Earth this is possible?

Stu, did you ever see those "cute" little troll things?

They were pencil toppers, cuddly toys, etc. They were basically chubby naked little guys with no genitals and a big afro of brightly coloured hair.

Oh, and tigoltrolly... they were so gay. They were like, gayer than DerangedBear's black guy. So yeah, you're probably one of them. Like Penfold, we Scots keep out of this sort of thing. But when you compare yourself to one of those glorified gimps, we have to ask questions....

Gayest. Thread. Ever.

ya maybe i just dont know im gay :( but if i was a troll thats what i'd be

btw doesnt deranged bear carry around a teddy bear? dont tell me thats not the least bit homosexual

most people here are okay in my book so no you havnt drawn yourself out. apparently im 1 of the very few people who can take a joke on these forums.

i didnt rant about how many women i've done dirty things with i just pointed out that if im gay he probly has alot of catching up to do to not be gay :(

and trust me i dont get offended by gay i am quite comfortable with my sexuality and i usually call people/things gay all the time