Eh, we'll see some turn up eventually. I'm mostly interested in Saint Walker and Atrocitus. I'm guessing Walker will get a SP or Trait that boosts his combat values when he's within x squares of a fig with the GL keyword.

Does Nanoarmor have any effect on the damage dealt by a character carrying Mjolnir?

EDIT: Did a search for it. Harpua leans toward negating the +2 to damage but I suspect that NBPerp is going to have to take a look at the issue...

That's what BudPalmer said

I said no such thing!

I would probably disagree with Harpua (respectfully). It is my perspective that the +2 to damage is not caused by the result of using Mjolnir as an object but a modification of the figs DV. I would allow it until I got a solid reason why it would be negated.

Mjolnir's bonus isn't due to using the object in the attack, as the object isn't used and your character isn't carrying it as it gets removed from the game

And that's exactly why I don't think Nanoarmor should negate the +2.

only issue is that nanoarmor is worded like this:

The character ignores damage dealt by objects as well as all modifiers to damage dealt to or taken by this character due to objects.

I know. The more I mull it over, the more I think Nanoarmor would ignore the +2 to damage.
Wait, wait! I've got it! See, in the feat description, it says objects. Mjolnir is a special object. See?! Nyah, nyah!

See, I'd have to lean toward Nanoarmor negating the +2 to damage from Mjolnir as well, strictly due to the highlighted part Wade pointed out... because that's what BudPalmer said!

Bazinga!!!

The Realms needs more fun threads like this one. I think I'll stay here awhile.

(Sets up camp site.)

Too many folks "out there" have no sense of humor. Get off my lawn!

my animated GIF isn't working...

Clearly you're doing it wrong or its too big. Bet you never heard the second part before!

it's 17kb...has a limit of like 77kb... makes me sad that I can't make Rainbow Bunchie jump about