You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
1. What didn't you like about Sloonei's response to Silver's vote?
2. What have you liked better about Sloonei since then allowing you to remove that vote?
3. I didn't say "no one is allowed to add another vote" or anything of the sort. Misrepresentation. Bad mark.
1. I answered that question about 1000 times. I don't know how you missed it . It looks like you're seemingly purposefully ignoring what I've said before. So I'll put this in caps: HIS LACK OF RESPONSE TO THE VOTE AND THE "WHY ARE PEOPLE VOTING FOR ME?" QUESTIONS HE WAS ASKING ARE TYPICALLY NOT LOOKED UPON POSITIVELY HERE.
2. I also stated this before. It was a matter of different playstyle.
3. You did, more or less, accuse me simply for adding a vote based on my own thoughts. You extrapolated to make that look bad in your own mind. In what instance would a second vote being added to Sloonei NOT been a "bad mark"?
1. I answered that question about 1000 times. I don't know how you missed it . It looks like you're seemingly purposefully ignoring what I've said before. So I'll put this in caps: HIS LACK OF RESPONSE TO THE VOTE AND THE "WHY ARE PEOPLE VOTING FOR ME?" QUESTIONS HE WAS ASKING ARE TYPICALLY NOT LOOKED UPON POSITIVELY HERE.
"Are typically not looked upon positively here" is not RenegadeRoy's opinion. It is a general statement about tendencies on this website.
Why did you share that general opinion in the moment?
Quote : Originally Posted by RenegadeRoy
3. You did, more or less, accuse me simply for adding a vote based on my own thoughts. You extrapolated to make that look bad in your own mind. In what instance would a second vote being added to Sloonei NOT been a "bad mark"?
A second vote wouldn't have been a "bad mark" had it been accompanied by a clearer and more personal accusation. It was a tagalong, and it wasn't sufficiently supported. Everything is subjective, I'm telling you what I see when I look at your content.
~~~
You've now officially thrown shade at me, but you haven't stated a read. Do it immediately. What is my alignment?
I sense there is some snooping happening. I'd like to see the rest of you kool kats in this here game thread while I babble. Roy and I could argue all evening and devour the whole thread in the process, but that's not the most effective or pro-town situation. Come say things. I might look like a lunatic given the way I've joined your game here tonight, but I promise I'm a nice man with lots of nice qualities.
Is Silver Lantern's reverse tracker claim corroborated by anyone else? It may have been, but I missed it if so.
Not really, but I did allege to having Grinner "dead to rights" on D2 about him killing Ignatz Mouse, meaning that I knew no one else targeted Ignatz. Ergo, RTer. A tracker would only see who Grinner targeted, not whom all targeted Ignatz. As others have said, RT is almost never a mafia power because it is easy to break in the hands of a smart mafia.
Quote : Originally Posted by mbauers
Ok, so this game's finally over?
Who the eff daykilled me back to back days? Seriously.
I can see where the culture differences can lead to some issues here. Let's all try to be respectful and mindful of everyone's different play styles. To be fair, we should play a game on their site to get a feel for how they play over there, cause obviously the "20 questions" game and "justify everything you say with some sort of answer we find acceptable" isn't quite doing it for us. And by the same token, "dude claim cause we gonna pressure you without telling you why" isn't gonna work for them.
Quote : Originally Posted by mbauers
Ok, so this game's finally over?
Who the eff daykilled me back to back days? Seriously.
I can see where the culture differences can lead to some issues here. Let's all try to be respectful and mindful of everyone's different play styles. To be fair, we should play a game on their site to get a feel for how they play over there, cause obviously the "20 questions" game and "justify everything you say with some sort of answer we find acceptable" isn't quite doing it for us. And by the same token, "dude claim cause we gonna pressure you without telling you why" isn't gonna work for them.
Since when are you this reasonable? Things have changed while I've been away.
A lot of people were giving MovingPictures a null read or something similar because his content was scarce. I've provided an immediate opportunity for that to change. I'd like to know what everyone's reads are on my player slot as of right now.