Then drop it and let it rest

Where's rule that limits the number of effects that can activate in "one finite point in time"?

There's no limit on the number of game effects which can activate during the finite point in time of an attack or during an ongoing period of time like the beginning of a turn.

I understand the point you make here, honest I do I imagine they'll all recieve errata to better align with free actions. I guess in this specific case I'm just sad that legality is required when the word "choose" sufficiently covers things in my eyes. (Having already chosen A, choosing B is disallowed, and choosing A again is redundant.)

That being said, I am strongly in favor of clarity and simplicity and consistency.

OK, the Playtest teams OR Eric Englehard. Better?

Enhancement has a trigger...the other guy making a ranged attack. That only happens one time, so the trigger for Enhancement is only pulled one time.

...or the art department...or some other guy we don't even know...or any number of other possible reasons.

I will make it a point to exploit this loophole at my upcoming tourney, taking time to educate those I play against before hand.

I could tell people how broken this is, but I feel that showing them will cause more of an uproar and speed the errata process. =)

When a person knows how something works or what it is supposed to say, it can be very easy to not see the errors. Just think of all the times you left the "not" or "n't" out of a reply despite the number of times you read it before posting. No play testers have ever caught all the errors in a rules system or been able to predict how every player would try to interpret those rules. Would definitely be unfair to say the play testers are to blame here.

So... one of the other 4 people working for Wizkids?

This. I went to school for Journalism, and this is the bloody lesson of proofreading...Things will be missed, it's inevitable because you "know" how something reads/works, and that knowledge taints your interpretation. Only time and/or a fresh pair of eyes will catch anything...

(I mean, a great number of character cards contain grammatical errors in the bios. I see 'em, but since it effects nothing, I can ignore it. But misinterpretable text in rules/powers is just as easy to miss and far more important to correct.)

Wow, I must say this version of Wolverine now has quite a bit of comic accuracy. A great deal of noise was made over his six clix dial, but now if he's not killed in a single turn, he's back to full. Ha! Certainly worth his points while this lasts. =)

Exactly how do you figure it will speed the errata process? As was noted earlier, this had already come up in discussion and will be corrected in the next player's guide. If you play your team and "cause an uproar," it will still be corrected in the next player's guide. I fail to see how that's going to make a difference.

There are plenty of times when something is "supposed" to get done and doesn't.

Uproar = Squeeky wheel
Errata = Oil

I'm not sure why "supposed" is in quotation marks in your reply. Are you suggesting that we say things will be addressed while planning on not doing it?
And uproar has nothing to do with errata. If it did, Nightcrawler would have received errata a long time ago.

You specifically? Can't make that determination. I don't really know you.
But just because something is in line for a change doesn't mean it's going to happen. Baby crib companies, for example, have will have a decent number of safety issues with a new or existing models that will cost some children their lives. If the cost is high enough, they'll change it. If it isn't, it won't be.
And don't tell Vet Icons Superman uproar has nothing to do with errata. They changed the power completely due to uproar.