From just a few posts? Not really. Usually takes me more than that to start getting a feel for anything.

Day 1 is always a struggle.

I don't snuggle on the first day. I'm not that kind of girl

You're not exacly helping.

What would you like from me? Night results? Day results? I'm terrible at reading players, made even more obvious by my terrible plays in Among Us during game night.


*eyes Morph suspiciously*

I'm always impressed how people suspect someone from one or a few posts.

I am torn if I like majority or plurality better. In plurality, the 'no elimination' vote is much more important, and I think that can give information how people use it, just like votes on someone that might not end in an elimination in majority, but I feel it's easier to get things going in plurality, as a single vote can carry more weight, and it's more about timing.

I'm at least happy there's no freddy, although I appreciated the discussion it generated, there were quite some posts to just post I think.

Even if you have no reads of your own you still have a vote and can support one of the existing trains. Or draisines as the case may be.

When I suspect people, it usually means they're Town. My reads are just that bad.

The only "read" I have of anyone so far is that Quebbster seems to be starting out more aggressively than usual. Not sure what if I think that's indicative of towniness or not towniness.

Or 0 posts, in the case of Quebbster voting for me before I even realized the thread was open.

I just learned a new word. I think I've only seen them referred to as handcars before.

I used wikipedia for translation. It's called "dressin" in Swedish.

So vote for someone you don't suspect then?

Hey now. It's not my fault he made himself look scummy I just didn't contradict him.

Did he miss the double kill on you too?