You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
Alternative is to have someone Pyschic blast a target whilst stood next to collosus then he FB's them in. Someone who gets Combat Reflexes would be nice!
Well waht if you had him throw SOD superman. Now that is nasty. And now SOS supes has just gone up a level. Now you can use him. Just him him carry around colossus til the time is right. Then he get throw using a 10 attck for 5 clixs.
I think you should really chuck Daniel Ketch LE with Colossus. He's got an 11 Attack with 4 Damage on the 2nd Click
Or better yet the Ghost Rider (V) from Ultimates with the activation click *snicker*
Quote : Originally Posted by Grappler
Your lyrics are greatness! They definitely go into my HC Realms Hall of FAME list
R Triplicate Girl is 35 points, slap Drag on her, and Fastball her to drag.
Would work great against turrets who are on elevated, slowly picking away at your forces.
Question!
If the enemy is elevated, and you throw Fastball at him, but there is no legal square to place Fastball as action resolves, does the FastBall fall off roof and take 2 damage? Or is placed on the ground in front of enemy with no falling damage?
If the enemy is elevated, and you throw Fastball at him, but there is no legal square to place Fastball as action resolves, does the FastBall fall off roof and take 2 damage? Or is placed on the ground in front of enemy with no falling damage?
~Phil
From the SP description:
... deal it 1 unavoidable damage, and place it in the square nearest to the target to which Colossus has a clear line of fire. If the square is not adjacent to the target, deal the character 1 additional unavoidable damage.
Since the thrown character isn't knocked back in any way, shape, or form, there is no way for it to "fall". Just do exactly what the card says, which in your case is place the character in a square near the target (in front and grounded does sound like your best bet) and deal 2 clicks of unavoidable damage (1 for the throw and 1 since the character isn't adjacent).
If the enemy is elevated, and you throw Fastball at him, but there is no legal square to place Fastball as action resolves, does the FastBall fall off roof and take 2 damage? Or is placed on the ground in front of enemy with no falling damage?
~Phil
Quote : Originally Posted by [B
FASTBALL SPECIAL[/b]]Colossus can use Telekinesis, but only Option 3. When using Telekinesis, Colossus can treat any adjacent friendly character that has a point value more than 30 and the Starburst damage symbol as if it were a light object. but the character is not destroyed in the attack. After the attack is resolved, modify the character's attack value and damage value by -2 until the end of the turn, deal it 1 unavoidable damage, and place it in the square nearest to the target to which Colossus has a clear line of fire. If the square is not adjacent to the target, deal the character 1 additional unavoidable damage.
I think the bolded part would apply. You put the "Fastballed" character on the ground, and deal him 1 additional unavoidable damage, but you don't deal him "falling" knockback damage.
Can you use tk to swing an adjacent object against an adjacent enemy, who at the start of the attack is standing on the said object?
Does stealth prevent you from this sweep (ranged) attack or the fact that both figs are non-flyers?
If you can infact use telekinesis to swing away like that, it might be an uncalled move when you have Colossus standing next to stealthed Batman.
"Sorry, I just might have to take your trash can under you and hit you with it."
Can you use tk to swing an adjacent object against an adjacent enemy, who at the start of the attack is standing on the said object?
Does stealth prevent you from this sweep (ranged) attack or the fact that both figs are non-flyers?
If you can infact use telekinesis to swing away like that, it might be an uncalled move when you have Colossus standing next to stealthed Batman.
"Sorry, I just might have to take your trash can under you and hit you with it."
From the FAQ:
Q: Can a character use Telekinesis to make a ranged combat attack with an adjacent object when an opposing character with Stealth that is standing on that object?
A: Yes. The character with Telekinesis may use that object to attack that opposing character. The opposing character does not block line of fire to that square when using the object the opposing character is standing on.
So you can yank an object out from under a Stealthed character and attack with the same object, yes... However, this would still be a ranged combat attack and Colossus (as a non-flying character) could only do this against an opposing flying character (since an adjacent opposing non-flying character would prevent Colossus from making ranged combat attacks).
A flying TK-er, like Green Lantern, could use this trick without restriction.
However, this would still be a ranged combat attack and Colossus (as a non-flying character) could only do this against an opposing flying character (since an adjacent opposing non-flying character would prevent Colossus from making ranged combat attacks).
A flying TK-er, like Green Lantern, could use this trick without restriction.
Though I can't find it in the FAQratta at the moment, I remember a caveat that allowed a non-flier to make the TK RC attack against an adjacent non-flier. One of those 'exception that proves the rule' I guess. Did this change or is my memory faulty?
BoT
Last edited by BootOfTesla; 11/24/2007 at 01:16..
Reason: Improved clarity
I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough wiper. I fart in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries....now go away or I shall taunt you a second time.
Though I can't find it in the FAQratta at the moment, I remember a caveat that allowed a non-flier to make the TK RC attack against an adjacent non-flier. One of those 'exception that proves the rule' I guess. Did this change or is my memory faulty?
BoT
Like you said, I can't find it in any of the documentation. If it exists, it was a forum ruling that never made into the official stuff
Maybe a search of the WK forums can turn it up. I'd look right now, but I am kind of in a hurry this morning. I'll check later (and if someone else finds it in the meantime, so much the better ).