So if, I'm reading this right. If TonyStarkPrime pulls his vote and Quebbster does not, I become the lynched. So I would have to vote for someone that has 1 vote already and hope that the other voter does not pull their vote.

Am I reading that correctly?

The strategy of plurality is definitely interesting. Mafia with an early rush can actually control a bit of the vote sway. I have to think on this a bit.

So it's time stamped. Would it make sense to assume that if there's a two vote tie, the earlier second vote determines it rather than the earliest first vote? And so on for more votes?

*cough*Luke Cage*cough*

Seriously, he was in prison. Granted, it was a crime he didn't commit, but it wouldn't surprise me if he has the Criminal tag.

And that vote on you puzzles me too. I really think TSP is a prime candidate if we're actually gunning for people here.

Something like that, yes. I do believe "No Lynch" is a valid vote though.
remove vote for now as I bear you no ill will.

Yes, that's how I read it. We're 6 hours from the end, but it's worth noting. And since I'm on the list of people with votes, your situation has some meaning for me too.

Back to the matter at hand. Anyone else brave enough to float an idea? Here's one other I've been entertaining. Each mafia member has their own hidden alt-win condition. The reasoning is that I'm having a tough time coming up with a scenario where all of them work together absolutely. All of them go along to get along, but all the characters who I can see being scum will turn on the others if the opportunity presents itself. Even with their inherent protection of Fisk, I can see it. One by one they desert him to pursue their own agendas.

Is No Lynch a valid vote? Is it a smart play day one?

I had that thought. But it's down to whether gfish played that angle. And it's down to how much he wanted to marginalize Jessica's power.

What do you think of Afrcngy? Same boat as TSP?

*shrug* I like you better. Afrcngy second, probably. The possibility that you and Mal are both mafia and manufactured a fight over something small, only to both move on to voting for quiet players, is high enough I feel it's worth pursuing.

So how about dropping a little info? Nothing like a full claim, of course, but perhaps which show you're from, or your description?

Depends on how strongly you feel about the targets, I suppose. JoH would likely have some long, well thought out argument, but I'm afraid I don't have near his experience or grasp of theory. I will say that I think it's often a better idea to lynch per theory, but with our flavor-heavy games folks really dislike getting killed early (especially as it often means a lengthy wait for the next game).

That would be my thought.

So if someone has a tie at 1 the first person with the vote via timestamp would be lynched.

Same with ties on 2 or more.

But when that goes back down to a tie on a lower number. The first person that had that lower number would be the lynched.

So just as an example,

A, B, C, D, E all have one vote to start in order.

C,D gets another vote in order (now C leads, with D in second, A, B, E following in that order)


F gets a quick 3
So now it's F C D A B E.

One voter on C and D and A feel that F is a viable candidate
Now it's
F B C D E again.

F reveals they're unmistakably town. All their votes disappear
And it's B C D E

Day ends B gets lynched.

At least that's how I read it.

I'm back. I chose Cbob as my vote target because I assumed he would be alive and willing to say something. I am leaving it there for now, as I feel like his posting pattern this game has been suspicious, but I am willing to pull out.

Sorry, just catching up. This weekend was kind of crazy.

I didnt vote for you though?

I am at work so yeah, I am going to be popping in and out...I was checking on the vote total because I dont have time to go through and tally things up. In a game where it is so easy to accidentally lynch someone, I thought it was a valid question.

That is how it worked in the Starnger Things game.

Well, the demogorgon provided a very real clock vs the town, so early pressure made sense there in a way that may not apply to other games, regardless of the plurality voting. I don't see a similar mechanic for Killgrave, but maybe it is just worded differently and I am not seeing it.