You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
The way I usually see the TACs dropped is from a SSw J37 ordinance truck. If things look rough for them (dropping AnP infantry on them) the J37 scoops them back up and moves them to safety. Having wheeled movement, they are also repaired by the J37.
Its gotten so common, that transports are becoming targets of choice, and the Big Mech can wait.
I don't think any of the envoys had any agenda's with regards to any players playing. I know this since I was one of the envoy's and spent a good 3 days talking with the other 4 guys who helped run the event; I would be hard pressed to state any comment made by any of them which would be considered negative or biased toward/against any player.
Every envoy who was assigned to nationals knew someone who was playing in the Nationals event (some of us knew many people). We made a 110% effort to do the following:
1. Make No calls for the person/persons who we knew personally or had any relationships with/to, if we saw someone we knew with their hand raised, we called another envoy over to make the call.
2. Made an effort to avoid any discussions about the matches with people we knew while the matches were going on.
I don't think any of those envoy's have/had any personal ax to grind and as far as I can tell we don't'/did'nt have any agenda's except to make sure that everyone who played played fair and nicely. The only thing I got hot about myself was people who were obviously stalling/cheating/being donkeys to their opponents. I act the same way at my venue and thats my personal MW pet peeve.
As someone who didn't go to Nationals last year but heard an EARFUL from the 10+ players in my area who went/played I can truthfully say that the only comments made to me during the 2 days (outside of "how long do we have for lunch, when is lunch, do I have time to pee) were how much better this event was run vs last year and how much better the calls were being made.
And I an attest that none of the envoys had anything against/for etc... Corle. I didn't even know who Corle was until late in the day on day one, nor did I know who the winner of nationals last year was until someone pointed him out to me- so I'm pretty sure I did not have any bias against Corle or Noetists (sp).
Not to have it taken the wrong way but I really don't give a flying F about Corle, heck or any of the other players in the final 8 (meaning I don't know them from Adam and so they don't really make a whole hell of a lot of difference in my life one way or the other) Corle must have played a good game (since he won) and there should be no question that the games were played fair since Rain pretty much sat and watched him play 8 straight matches.
So before all you all go wanking off on the battlemasters who were watching the event, try to find something else to blame.
heck, maybe someone can start the insert name here thread played a "cheese" army.
I'm going to go on record as saying anyone who whines about the "unfair/impartial" battlemaster is cheese.
sheesh.
darlin13
btw, Nice to see you back Corle (I didnt even know you were gone.)
Quote
Originally posted by Sarphus Good to see you back Corle :)
I think rain did an awesome job. I think I know what BM you're talking about as being biased, because I saw one BM in particular do a few things that appeared to be directed at specific players.
I only took a BM call one one thing. Rain happened to be watching the game, so I asked her to "remove all doubt" on a LOS call. She ruled against me, which is fine. To be completely honest it was too close for me to tell one way or the other :)
I think Rain was completely impartial in her rulings, and did a wonderful job. Since the other BM's are volunteers, some of them have their enemies from the boards. Most of the BM's struck me as completely impartial, but one in particular appeared to have an agenda (what a child)
Corle, iyo, what would be the fix for Mechs to make them effective. Mind you, not just against VTOLs, but all tactics that reduce them to a laughable state in many cases. A return fire rule is it? Or reduce charging to primary speed? Move and shoot? Or something else?
Originally posted by will63 edit: infantry swarm with 3x AAs plus arty could challenge Nick's army though ...
It really depends on the infantry swarm. The army in its original incarnation was built to be an all purpose army and it has been successful against several infantry/arty concepts.
Well played infantry/arty concepts can defeat the army, so can other well played concepts. The thing that was most unique about Nick's army is that he had the opportunity (with whatever he encountered) to win... or at least a good chance. 50% or better... usually more like 80%. Nick's a better player than I am anyways :-) therefore, the army was more than likely to win.
Originally posted by RUMPH You are correct sir. Nicks army was awsome, if it had one weakness it was to Infantry Swarms. Vtol swarms bog down when presented with massive numbers of targets. They just can't kill the little buggers fast enough to off set eventual losses. My army building partner (Puptup) Faced nick with a Liao Infantry swarm army and gave Him a good run in round 3.
Firstly I'd like to point out I played a minor adaptation of one of Kiserai's armies.
Secondly...that was a fun game...and would have been very different, had he been player one. Ugh. But as it was, it proved to me one thing:
I believe my army could handle Infantry Swarm better than Corle's...however, Corle's definitely handled big single mech as well, if not better, than mine. And he had the first strike option. And I was still hurt rather severely in situations where I was player two. It was...interesting. I tried to build an army that could handle being player two, and I still found it a major inconvienence.
Does anyone other than me really like being the guy who places reactionary terrain (2nd and last)?
Originally posted by noeticist Does anyone other than me really like being the guy who places reactionary terrain (2nd and last)?
Definitely not me. In most of my matchups at nationals, I would have prefered to go second so I could place the first terrain. Granted, I didn't have a first strike army, and I didn't play against any first strike armies, so that's probably a big reason why.