You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
You need to re-read what you typed. I didn't research what you've written on multiple threads, just what you typed here:
You said you don't think it's nessessary to change and that it's a 'fun'. I commented on that. The fact that you completely ignored the point I was trying to make while ignoring the very words you typed is almost impressive. Almost.
Not really.
Did I say it wasn't necessary to change? No, I said that it is fun except for the getting trapped forever. That's what "until the figure is trapped forever..." means. Then I offered a way to fix the bit about being trapped forever stating that maybe instead of getting rid of the entire tactic they could just fix it. And no, I didn't ignore your point. I agree it needs to be changed and I certainly didn't ignore your point saying I just want to abuse some tactic for my own gain or some such thing. Again, how you get these intentions while supposedly reading my post is beyond me.
As far as capture is concerned, Jon is right, the only reason this tactic is much more effective right now is because of Brother Voodoo. The mobility he has is fantastic, he has prob, and he has a huge attack value boosted by a nearby cruiser. The only reliable capture figure right now is the arkham guard who pales in comparison to voodoo. So if you are going to set up a combo like that the arkham guard leaves a lot to be desired where voodoo is a hugely solid figure even without the tactic (cruiser as well). Its the fact that these figures are so good on TOP of being able to capture at any given moment. As-is it is simply too powerful. So, again, either they can say it cant be done entirely or try and fix it to make it more balanced. Or they could leave it as is just for me so I can tool all the little kids that play at my comic store with this super awesome tactic.
He's reinforcing what we all know about WK- if anyone has anything remotly criticizing about them, then everything they say automatically has to be ignored no matter how much sense it makes because you don't agree with everything they say.
Basically, if you were a yes man- your suggesations would be valid. Since you aren't, your points are invalid.
It's a horrible symptom of whatever disease sycophants suffer from.
He's reinforcing what we all know about WK- if anyone has anything remotly criticizing about them, then everything they say automatically has to be ignored no matter how much sense it makes because you don't agree with everything they say.
Basically, if you were a yes man- your suggesations would be valid. Since you aren't, your points are invalid.
It's a horrible symptom of whatever disease sycophants suffer from.
Sycophancy[1] is obsequious flattery.
Alternative phrases are often used such as:
apple-polishing
### kissing
### licking
bootlicker
brown nosing
crawler
fawning
flunky
grovelling
hanger-on
kowtowing
lackey
lickspittle
sucking up
toady
yes man
John S
So yah, I'd have to agree.
Let me find the strength to cut back on this game!
He's reinforcing what we all know about WK- if anyone has anything remotly criticizing about them, then everything they say automatically has to be ignored no matter how much sense it makes because you don't agree with everything they say.
Basically, if you were a yes man- your suggesations would be valid. Since you aren't, your points are invalid.
It's a horrible symptom of whatever disease sycophants suffer from.
We've alread said we're looking into it. How is that even remotely like saying that any points brought up (on either side) are invalid?
We've alread said we're looking into it. How is that even remotely like saying that any points brought up (on either side) are invalid?
To me, it says the exact opposite, in fact.
Just your typical overreactions Mr. View. Sense, facts and basic social politeness need not apply.
Quote : Originally Posted by krusticlese
He's reinforcing what we all know about WK- if anyone has anything remotly criticizing about them, then everything they say automatically has to be ignored no matter how much sense it makes because you don't agree with everything they say.
What does he have to do with WK? I'll have you know in my case though, I just legitimately disagree with everything you say It must be a gift.
Quote : Originally Posted by hair10
What the hell are you talking about?
I'm talking about Happy Dust Man, Joy Powder, Stardust, White Wings, you know what I'm saying? No, seriously, do you? Because I have no clue.
aqhoffman- greatest post possibly ever
jtallday- Jon I wouldn't challenge you if I wasn't sure you are wrong cuz I don't have that kind of energy.
He's reinforcing what we all know about WK- if anyone has anything remotly criticizing about them, then everything they say automatically has to be ignored no matter how much sense it makes because you don't agree with everything they say.
Basically, if you were a yes man- your suggesations would be valid. Since you aren't, your points are invalid.
It's a horrible symptom of whatever disease sycophants suffer from.
Ah, thanks for translating.
There are 542,000 children in foster care. Talk to your local foster and adoptive agency. You could change a life.
Why hasn't techgod popped in here and said "don't be dense, of course you can't do that?".
He IS the RA, right?
Because if they are going to change the rules they are going to discuss the intent first before bluntly coming in and saying it can't be done. I think this will eventually happen, NV said they are reviewing it which likely means it will happen, so just wait for the process to complete. If not for the process the rules would feel even more arbitrary and subject to change than it already is.
I think he mistranslated it. I ran it through a few different sites and what seems to be the correct translation, as near as I can tell...
"There is only so much Axe one can grind." Or something like that.
aqhoffman- greatest post possibly ever
jtallday- Jon I wouldn't challenge you if I wasn't sure you are wrong cuz I don't have that kind of energy.
Because if they are going to change the rules they are going to discuss the intent first before bluntly coming in and saying it can't be done. I think this will eventually happen, NV said they are reviewing it which likely means it will happen, so just wait for the process to complete. If not for the process the rules would feel even more arbitrary and subject to change than it already is.
Not JUST the intent, but the wording. The fact of the matter is is that it is perfectly legal with the way everything is worded. So they need to issue an Errata or Clarification, honestly I can't think of how to do it without an Errata. And they need to make sure the Errata is very clear and not something that leads to more problems down the road. We don't need anymore "movement during HSS can only be modified down" kind of rules in this game.
aqhoffman- greatest post possibly ever
jtallday- Jon I wouldn't challenge you if I wasn't sure you are wrong cuz I don't have that kind of energy.