Heres the scenario:

I have a Warskrull back to back with another Warskrull and a Skrull General adjacent to both and all 3 have Warbound.

Warskrull #1 gets based with Korg.

Warskull #1 outwits Korg and punches him for 3 and "Warbounds" the action token to the Skrull General.

NOW...can Warskrull #1 take another swing and Warbound it to Warskrull #2 because techinically he doesnt have an action token, the Skrull General does.

I was under the impression that the action token denotes an action for the turn and once youve received an action token that character cant receive 2 in the same turn.

The opposite arguement comes up...so if Warskull #1 hit, transferred the token over to the Skrull General that was Warskrull #1s action and the Skrull General got the token, BUT then if the action wasnt the Skrull General he should be able to attack but he CANT because he has an action token for the turn!!!

Its one or the other not both right? Because then in essence Warbound ties up 2 actions and I dont think that was the intent of the card.

Warskrull #1 should be able to hit, then transfer, use action number 2 to hit again, transfer to Warskull #2, then use the final 3rd allotted action for himself and hit and keep his action token. So all three actions were used but swung by the same character.

Yes no? Tired or arguing how this card works!!!

I haven't checked the rules, but I'm pretty sure how it's said is you can only take one non-free action a turn.

So #1 would take an action, give the token to the general. Then the general could push himself and take an action himself. Basically he just got incapped on his own turn. Getting an action token does not actually denote taking your non-free action for the turn.

The General doesn't even qualify. He isn't even close to half the Warskrull's 110 cost. The Warskrull can only defer tokens to the other Warskrull or figures 56 points or higher OR 164 points or lower. The General clocks in at 43.

definitely no. and you can't warbound the token to skrull general.

This is correct. Even if the War Skrull could transfer the token to the General, he can still only be assigned one non-free action in a turn regardless of who actually got the token.

It was hypothetical just to figure out how the action tokens get applied.

The only restriction is that the figure that recieves the token must be at least half of the points of the figure taking the action. There is no maximum. My 11 point rookie Skrull Agent could give a token to Super Skrull because Super Skrull, at 150 points, is equal to at least half of the Skrull Agents cost.

Does this example sound correct:

My team:Teen Keyword

• Invincible with Protected and Warbound-122pts.
• Cosmic Boy with Warbound- 75pts.
• Dawnstar with Warbound-65pts.
• Bucky with Warbound-35pts. Yeah I know it's a waste, but it's the rules.
• 297pts.
  
  OK, turn 1: CB TK's Invicible out 10 squares, getting a token. Dawnstar carries Bucky 10 squares, she gets a token. Invincible HS Move and-attacks an opponent, getting a token.
  
  Turn 2: Invincible HS Move-and-attacks again but ends next to Dawnstar and gives her a token (cause of Warbound). Bucky moves in front of Invicible, Buks gets a token. CB and Invincible clear.
  
  Turn 3: Invincible HS Move-and-attacks again, getting a token.
  CB moves up, getting a token. Bucky and Dawnstar clear.
  
  Turn 4: Invincible attacks again, ending next to CB who gets the Token. Dawnstar attacks and gets a token. Invincible clears.
  
  Yadda-Yadda-Yadda...
  
  So is this Correct? By rotating token placement, Invincible can attack every turn? As long as he ends his turn next to a Warbound fig who is AT LEAST HALF his points, right?
  

Attached Images

HMMU_F-100.jpg (94.9 KB, 12 views)

Not quite.
First of all, you can only transfer tokens to figures with 0 action tokens - as I understand your example, you want to transfer tokens to figures that already have a token, which is not allowed.
Secondly, as I understand it you need to be adjacent at the start of the action in order to transfer tokens - not the start or the end. I may be wrong, but in that case someone is bound to correct me.

Yeah I see it on the card now (about the zero action tokens).

OK can you give me an example that is legal? Please Quebby?

You must be adjacent at the beginning of the action. That is correct.

Legal example?

Cosmic Boy TKs Invincible out and gets a token.
Dawnstar carries out Bucky, and gives Bucky the token.
Invincible attacks and gets a token.

Next turn, Dawnstar attacks and carries Bucky again. She gets the token, and CB, Bucky, and Invincible clear.

Turn three, Dawnstar attacks again, giving the token to Bucky.
Bucky attacks later that turn, giving himself a second token. Normal pushing rules apply, so if he were on his willpower click, he won't take any damage, otherwise you would click him. Dawnstar will clear.

And on it goes.

That's correct. Only if you begin adjacent.

Ok Im good now...got a hold of NBPERP at the WKs site and printed out his responses.