You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
132-60 matches, 20 tourney wins (67-100) 2013
223-112 matches, 31 tourney wins 2012,Arcadia Grand prix runner up 2012,Arcadia Grand prix Runner up 2013
ROC West Coast Winner Co-Main Event 2013
i know it may be much for those who volunteer there time, but when there is a ruling that changes the rules of a power or how the game is played it should be noted in a thread with like rulings.
132-60 matches, 20 tourney wins (67-100) 2013
223-112 matches, 31 tourney wins 2012,Arcadia Grand prix runner up 2012,Arcadia Grand prix Runner up 2013
ROC West Coast Winner Co-Main Event 2013
How so? I can think of many questions not addressed in the PG or the Final Word. Some are even addressed in your compiled rulings!
Is this your resignation from doing this? Do you plan to notify Quebbster so this sticky can be removed if it will no longer be maintained?
Quote : Originally Posted by thrawn22
i know it may be much for those who volunteer there time, but when there is a ruling that changes the rules of a power or how the game is played it should be noted in a thread with like rulings.
Minor edit: delete the "&highlight=Takion" and the thread is easier to look at.
Good point. Do you think it's time to bring back that one thread? The parking lot or something? The one that links to all threads still in the dep cave and a compiled list of all rulings that can only be found on hcr and not in any rules document yet, to help the common player find these rulings and to help rules team remember what still needs to be addressed (their plate is full enough, helping them seems like something they would appreciate)? Do you want to rez that thread under the hopes the OP will maintain it? I'll have to go check who started it before I consider that action. Do you want to start and maintain your own new thread for that purpose? If not, let me know. I think I could do that if you don't want it. Then we'll have to notify Quebbster once it gets going to sticky it.
Sun Tzu Clan Leader
Quote : Originally Posted by Uberman
When a game hums along, full of action and excitement, it's a barnburner!
When it trudges forward glacially, bogged down by debates over ridiculous rules minutia, it's a Barnstable!
I don't mind doing it - I liked keeping everything up to date in fact. I just got the feeling from some of the oranges that it wasn't particularly smiled upon, so I just kind of stopped...
How so? I can think of many questions not addressed in the PG or the Final Word. Some are even addressed in your compiled rulings!
Is this your resignation from doing this? Do you plan to notify Quebbster so this sticky can be removed if it will no longer be maintained?
Minor edit: delete the "&highlight=Takion" and the thread is easier to look at.
Good point. Do you think it's time to bring back that one thread? The parking lot or something? The one that links to all threads still in the dep cave and a compiled list of all rulings that can only be found on hcr and not in any rules document yet, to help the common player find these rulings and to help rules team remember what still needs to be addressed (their plate is full enough, helping them seems like something they would appreciate)? Do you want to rez that thread under the hopes the OP will maintain it? I'll have to go check who started it before I consider that action. Do you want to start and maintain your own new thread for that purpose? If not, let me know. I think I could do that if you don't want it. Then we'll have to notify Quebbster once it gets going to sticky it.
i tink something should be done to insure that the clix community at large is made aware of a major rules change and there should be a thread to find it.
Quote : Originally Posted by jwb441
I don't mind doing it - I liked keeping everything up to date in fact. I just got the feeling from some of the oranges that it wasn't particularly smiled upon, so I just kind of stopped...
not smiled upon? thats counter productive. if i can go to one thread and find rulings for everything clix that wasn't put into the PG or has come up in recent months than id think the oranges and everyone related to running the site would appreciate your efforts and commend you for it.
132-60 matches, 20 tourney wins (67-100) 2013
223-112 matches, 31 tourney wins 2012,Arcadia Grand prix runner up 2012,Arcadia Grand prix Runner up 2013
ROC West Coast Winner Co-Main Event 2013
i know it may be much for those who volunteer there time, but when there is a ruling that changes the rules of a power or how the game is played it should be noted in a thread with like rulings.
I have a general ruling thread I'm going to put that under - I actually don't know anybody that noticed that pulsewave no longer "replaces then modifies"
Good call!
Ad for the future of this thread - Machineman saw no problem keeping it here, so I think I'll continue to maintain it
Since you've been watching so many rulings, I'm wondering if you've come across a ruling about PW that ignores certain figures? Like if Skirn is adjacent to a friendly Worthy and uses PW (which the friendly Worthy ignores) with only 1 other (opposing) figure in the PW blast range, would the damage value be her full value (as there's only one target she's not ignoring in the range) or would it be 1 (as the friendly Worthy is in the blast range)?
I've already gotten the rulings from deputies that the friendly Worthy's powers wouldn't be ignored so they could use a TTPC, Perplex, or whatnot... whether it can be a single-target PW or not is one I haven't seen an answer to yet.
-Heroclix is not a game of logic, it's a game of strategy .... after all, when's the last time that you saw a giant (using a stealth ability) that was hiding behind a swingset... and nobody could SEE him????
Since you've been watching so many rulings, I'm wondering if you've come across a ruling about PW that ignores certain figures? Like if Skirn is adjacent to a friendly Worthy and uses PW (which the friendly Worthy ignores) with only 1 other (opposing) figure in the PW blast range, would the damage value be her full value (as there's only one target she's not ignoring in the range) or would it be 1 (as the friendly Worthy is in the blast range)?
I've already gotten the rulings from deputies that the friendly Worthy's powers wouldn't be ignored so they could use a TTPC, Perplex, or whatnot... whether it can be a single-target PW or not is one I haven't seen an answer to yet.
As far as I know (and this was forever ago) when MODOK was out it was ruled that even though he ignored people it was not a single target. So I assume the same follows.
As far as I know (and this was forever ago) when MODOK was out it was ruled that even though he ignored people it was not a single target. So I assume the same follows.
There's a whole thread on it I can link if you want. Basically, no, every special pulse wave works entirely differently because of subtle wording differences.
Sun Tzu Clan Leader
Quote : Originally Posted by Uberman
When a game hums along, full of action and excitement, it's a barnburner!
When it trudges forward glacially, bogged down by debates over ridiculous rules minutia, it's a Barnstable!