i tried him in my deck and it ain't that amazing even if u play a spell counter deck.
i just wished it had an higer atk lol like atleast 16 - 17 so it dosen't die from my opponents weak monster

i am just going to get a breaker he is way better

he can be great if you can keep him on the field and have plenty of spell cards. however, just putting him in any deck is a bad idea. but with protection, he's a pretty efficient form of monster removal.

I think he's an average monster with the best freaking artwork in the game.

His effect isn't bad but his stats are very lacking. I also agree on the artwork.

People people people, you're all missing the best part of playing blast magician. He's AWSOME against stall.

"Nobleman of crossout your face down monster, putting a counter on blast."

"Hah, its big shield guardna, he isnt removed from play!"

"OK, blast magician, remove a token, destory guardna. Lily attack directly."

You can replace guardna with any high def/stall monster (read: TER) your opponent may have out.

Well, he is still a level 4 monster and cannot attack under Gravity Bind. In this case, Mystic Swordsman LV2 is a much better choice.

Blast Magician is an ok card. Nothing great though...

If his stats were swapped so it was 1700/1400, he'd be a bit better. He really relies on a lot of magic cards if you want to take out big beatstick monster's though...it takes 3 magic cards just to kill a 2000 ATK monster. 5 to kill a 3000...He's an ok card, but nothing like people cracked him up to be before he was actually released (thus, he was extremely overrated).

Since it is a fire monster he belongs in a fire deck no doubt. Since fire is starting to get some support protection should be no problem. Yes I know that playing five spells in a turn would get hard but pulling off the effect at least once can break strategy. Breaker is a one time effect most of the time. It is a pretty balanced card.