You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
Multiple Shield Breaking (Not Your Typical Question)
Note: to go stright to the question, skip to the ////////// below.
Hello to all Everone. This is my first post in CCGRealms. But, even though I'm new here, I've been playing a few CCG's for quite some time now.
The following question has been bothering for quite some time (It's a shame that DM doesn't have defined comprehensive rules like magic does)
When a creature with "double breaker" attacks and isn't blocked it creates the effect "break 2 (of your opponent's) shields". I already know that the each shield will be broken one at a time. However, I was wandering about the order:
//////////
when a double breaker is unblocked do I:
A) choose both shields and then have them break in the order I chose them, one at a time
B) choose one shield have it getting broken (opp' applies shield trigger etc') then choose the next shield and so on..
C) choose both shields and then my opponent chooses the order in which they will be broken
D) choose both shields but break them in any order I want (one at a time of course). this is different from B with that that with B I'm less limited.
\\\\\\\\\\
Implications:
*C* when I know what 2 shields are and I want to break one unknowkn shield and depending on the result of shield breaking I will choose the next shield to be borken
*B* when my opponent knows what 2 of his shields are and both have shield trigger effects who's order of triggering matters.
*A* none of the above
I think that B is correct but I couldn't find anything regarding this.
P.S - for all of you who doesn't know the GBA DM games are incorrect because you choose the shield as an attack target instead of the player (and then if he's unblocked choose the shield to break for the effects).So it makes it hard for me to rely on its ruling (I think it was option B ) however it's the closest thing I've got.
Your help is appreciated. Sorry for the long text.