Ok guys.......whos better? they both have a similar role in armies so which one do you like better? why?

6string, I have to disagree, I think they serve very different roles in an army (at least in my armies). The Wyvers is s heavy harasser, he has the mobility and urability to tie things up and get a few clicks in before having to limp back to a healer. The Centaur Champion, on the other hand, in a front line attacker. He's hard to hit, deals good damage and has first strike potential with charge. It might just be my playstyle, but I can't think of a time when it has come down to one or the other.

They fill different roles... and they're pt cost is way apart...

different !

with the CC (centaur champion) you go attack a fig that you want to attack.

the Wyvern attacks only support figs (he only gets to attack big figs if THEY base him).

I agree with people here, they are quite different figures.

The Centaur Champion is pretty versatile, can be used as a bodyguard (fast charge + decent attack + decent damage), big capturer, anti harassment and even main attacker.

Wyvern is much more a heavy harasser, doesn't play the roles of bodyguard, or main attacker. His mobility + venom make him excelent against small harassers and supporters.

Something else: As War Consort mentioned, there's a 15 points difference between them.

I also agree that they are very different, although their point costs aren't that different.

I would never use a wyvern in the same role as a CC, that just doesn't work. A wyvern has venom and fligt, the CC has charge those are two completely different roles to play in an army.