Okay, here is the text:

The New Brotherhood:
Ongoing: While you control four or less resources, Brotherhood characters you control get +2 ATK.

Lost City:
If a Brotherhood character you control would become powered-up, that character gets +3 ATK and +3 DEF for this attack instead.

Now... if I have both of those in play, as long as I have 4 or less resources, do all my Brotherhood cards get +3/+3?

Or... do we get nitpicky and say that because The New Brotherhood is ongoing, they don't *become* powered-up and therefore only have +2 ATK.

power-ups are actually the specific instance when you discard a character card of the same name as the character you want to power-up, and the character receives +1/+1. Powered-up on the Lost City refers explicitly to that, not general stat increase.

Liquidroyl is correct.

Ahh... so that means that even PTs don't 'power-up' a card?

That's makes it a whole different card then, I thought +3/+3 for a 1 cost Location was a little much.

I had a question about Lost City, since it's phrased like a replacement effect ("instead") does that mean multiple Cities aren't cumulative?

My apologies if this has been asked already.

P.S. I thought I might as well just toss this in too, since it concerns a Brotherhood locale: if Savage Land's effect would reduce your character to 0 DEF will he/she automatically be stunned and removed from combat?

0 DEF doesn't stun. It's not like MtG, it just means they have no defense.

DDH: Yes, that was my interpretation of it as well, although I don't think the question has been posed previously.

The New Brotherhood stacks, Lost City doesn't.

Lost City couldn't possibly stack considering the fact the Locations are unique on the Field. So it's impossible (unless by effect) to have more than 1 Lost City on the field at a time.

The New Brotherhood is a Plot Twist which is not unique.

Well, alright. In the circumstance in which an ongoing plot twist comes out that does exactly the same thing as Lost City, I'd say it wouldn't stack ;)

Lost City would not stack, but it would effect each power-up (if you power up 3 times, you get +9/+9 instead of +3/+3).

Cheers!
-Ben =)

I agree with Kergy and erick, even if Lost City was a Plot Twist it wouldn't stack, my guess is due to the "instead" wording.

Huh, I didn't know Locations followed a uniqueness rule. Interesting.

And are you guys sure about the 0 DEF not-stunned thing? Savage Land seems pretty baroke at face value then (+6 ATK to end the game?). I guess I have to get used to the exponentional A/D curve thing (beautiful idea by the way).

From pg. 11 of the Rulebook:
Well i feel that if a 0 ATK Character attacked a 0 DEF Character, the defender would be stunned.

a number is a number, in the Rulebook it states "is equal to or greater" so 0 == 0 therefore the defender is stunned.

That's my thoughts on it anyway, it can go either way. It all comes down to how UDE wishs to rule a 0 situation. In YuGiOh when a 0 attacks a 0 they are both destroyed. Alternatively, a 0 attacking LP directly would not set off any Damage Triggers.

`{nova}