Who wins, Tim Drake / Battle of Wills or Sinestro? Is Sinestro's stun after the attack?

Sinestro 'wins'. At the point Sinestro's effect resolves, there are no longer any attackers (or defenders). Tim Drake/Battle of Wills no longer apply.

Even though Sinestro says "Whenever an attacker..." ?

The complete breakdown for how it all stacks was discussed in one of the Cerebro Rules columns i believe. He's just THAT powerful, it's ridiculous...

~JP

Sinestro is ridiculus, and without a doubt it is the card that's going to put CS in its place.

I like it ;)

Pssst...that's why Bastion attacks him first...

and that's why coast city/tumar tu/kyle rayner makes him impossible to attack first.

Or Why lanterns in love or guardians reborn can make people cry in combination with those cards.

He is ridiculous, and Bastion will pay dearly for his crimes against the metagame.

(gotta love the drama!)

Hey, good point. ;)

Define, "Nerfed"

If that is to mean they're going to start making cards illegal, then i'm going to complain about it, then continue playing this game anyway because its all i have in life.

"Pssst...that's why Bastion attacks him first..."

Problem with that is if GL is not running Coastal City or 4 drop Kyle Rayner, its going to be a definite suprise to me. Any Gl player not running some means of protecting support row characters from being attacked (even with flight) is not playing Sinestro right ;)



"nerfed" means using beatdown on characters "you control" (adding the simple template to SB and NS).

It may not happen, but they did it to flying kick, so you never know...

thats what me and my four 4 drop kyles have been saying.

-Sam

Ermm..what exactly did they do to flying kick?

Probably should be broken off into another topic, but the Flying Kick as printed in the new FF starter deck limits you to targeting a character you control. However, until the OCR changes, the original text of Flying Kick still applies.

Cassie Sandmarks win !