In a 300 point game, which makes for a better team?

A) 1 big figure (100 pts +) plus some support.

B) 2 figures (75-100 pt range) plus support.

C) A hoard of smaller figures (50-75 pt range) and support.

B

I think it depends on what you are after. I have fielded 300 point teams with a large point fig and have done alright. I choose A and B.

On the other hand, you do not wish to dump all those points into one figure.

B is better, but I prefer to play C.

C rocks, 6 figs with an average of 50 points has several advantages. First, it allows you to set your team up to make three actions every turn. Second, your two 150pt figs with a full dial only need to be 'smacked for 22 turns of the dial' at max, of course the big fig has high def, super senses, impervious ect..., but with one outwitter...BigBoy takes pain...from three attackers...if they hit. Three, my six 50pt figs need to take 4-6 clicks damage each to KO, that is 30 turns of the dial for those that are mathematically challenged (as is my grammar). I'm sure others could add to the reasons that a group of strong 50pt figs will dominate a pair or lone BigBoy. Let the attack on my weak logic begin............................................................................................... .................................................................................................... .NOW!