You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
What does that have to do with my observation? I guess my statement was more a long the lines of-you seem to not enjoy the comics anymore, so why bother? I wasn't saying anything that questioned his reviews or his analysis (or rather his opinions).
I didn't mean that in response to you. That being the case, I probably shouldn't have quoted you. Sorry my bad.
"I wasn't going do this for a another few weeks but seriously... turning all of humanity into apes. That was your master plan?"
* Saying "Shazam" doesn't do anything for Black Adam anymore. That eliminates pretty much his only weakness. It's probably meant to suggest weird stuff happening to the Marvel Family, but we know we won't know what's going on with them until One Year Later, with the Brave New World version of their Trials of Shazam! stuff. Eh.
* Oh, and Black Adam gets a cape to make him more generic, like the rest of the Marvel Family. I never like it when characters are made more generic.
* Representatives of Black Adam's allied countries. Copperheads's a chick now? Oh, probably a new character. And there's Sonar and Blackfire (what country does she represent?) and Ibis (not looking too shabby for a guy who died in the Seven Soldiers stories, unless he's now a legacy character) and Ugly-New-Chinese-Dude and Girl-In-Green (she's Gloss, right? But isn't she Chinese too?) and a Rocket Red and... is that Kim Jong Il?
In the "5.2" interview over at Newsarama, they identify the rest of these characters. Most of your calls are right with the following exceptions - It's not Blackfire, but some royal villainess from the Young Justice series, the girl in the snake costume is NOT the new Copperhead, but what he refers to as a "Cobra." I have no idea if he meant Kobra or what. "Ugly-New-Chinese-Dude" is actually called August General in Iron.
* <sing-song voice> Black Adam's got a girl-friend!
* Eh, some stuff with Clark. He doesn't even get much of an interview, but he only gets rehired but gets a raise? Not believing it, sorry.
The way I read that, there was more to the interview than what was shown on the page. Assuming this was the case, then the story, a scoop mind you, could have been pretty powerful. In the comics world, I think this justifies a raise.
* More Supernova teasers. His apparent powers are flight, teleportation, and the ability to teleport other things away (like the pavement). The only character I can think of with that combination of powers is Warp, and this sure doesn't seem like Warp.
* And Supernova is clearly not Booster. Booster's mad about Supernova.
...but remember, Booster is from the future and he's recently traveled there and back again. We know that time is messed up (see your comments below). Isn't an alternate timeline Booster or even a Booster from farther down the timeline possible? Whether the idea equals the kind of story or twist you like is irrelevant. An alternate Booster is possible. Whether or not this is where they're going, who knows?
* And Booster's only now starting to realize time's messed up? After, like, ten weeks? Geez, he's a slow learner. And visiting Rip Hunter's lab didn't give him a clue that time's messed up? And he's only now starting to think that he should investigate the fact that time's messed up, after having seen Rip's lab weeks ago? Sheesh, not buying this either.
Following some pretty on-the-ball action during Infinite Crisis, Booster's been remarkably dense lately. Remember, he hasn't actually had a chance to talk to Rip Hunter in order to make sense of the chalkboard writings. It's possible that his personal investment in the timeline's stability is making him overly cautious about making pessimistic conclusions, even though the clues are starting to pile up. I could buy that.
* Apparently T.O. Morrow can't pronounce the word "Doctor" correctly.
What are they doing to him in that prison?
* And Sivana was doing something with a cocoon, i.e, Mr Mind. Yawn. Nothing new there.
"Yawn" never applies to Mr. Mind stories, at least not to me. I dig that little worm.
* Next week: chick flick.
* And the History is a waste of space.
I can't wait for the origins backups. I'll actually read those rather than skim.
Firestorm #27 Stein's not dead. He's not "not dead" the way I thought he was going to be "not dead", but he's still "not dead". And boy does that take a while to actualize.
And, then, some other stuff. Firehawk separates from Firestorm, Gehenna's still jealous, and another version of Firestorm shows up. The end. Whatever.
JLA Classified #24 More classic stuff, though it's weird that Vixen says she can't fly, since she can, though I don't recall if she could fly at this point in her career. Anyway, this time, the spotlight is on Vixen, though Steel gets the cover. Aquaman seems wasted here, as he goes to rescue his friends and will have to be rescued himself. (I mean, duh, Aquaman versus a forest fire? Forest fire wins.)
The Next #1 The "next" comic to be cancelled, I'd say. Oh, wait, it's a miniseries, never mind. It'll instead be the "next" series to be completely ignored. (Anyone remember Haven? This is worse.) The writing feels like a little kid trying to be pretentious and/or artsy, and failing miserably. Captions like "You can't do it. Not unless you know some folks like these. You probably don't" are painful to read. Basically, bad writing all around, including a version of Metron who is quite chummy with Superman, who seems to have gained new powers over electromagnetic fields. Avoid this like the plague.
Green Arrow #64 More ugly art. Apart from a page or two of
character moments at the beginning, there's nothing new here. Green Arrow and Brick fight more druggies, take a rest, and fight more druggies. The End. Oh, wait, not quite. There's yet *more* of these "look, see, Deathstroke's in jail" moments. Yawn. And Speedy's back. She was gone? Were we supposed to care and/or wonder about her? Yeah, I know, she hasn't been mentioned in a while, but neither has Mind Grabber Kid. I wouldn't care if he returned either.
Green Lantern #12 Crimson Fox joins the Global Guardians. Yay, she's not dead. (Of course she's not; it was her sister who was killed twice.) And, yawn, Cyborg Superman. Let him die, guys. Nothing good has come from that whole mess of a story involving Superman's death. Doomsday? Stupid. Eradicator? Pointless. Parallax? Stupid. Cyborg Superman? Stupid. Let's not keep emphasizing the worst aspects of comics, please. However, the mystery deepens with new and old (and long thought dead) Green Lanterns appearing. Is it wrong that I like the new nimbo* Green Lantern? Anyway, the story could go somewhere good, but right now it's wading through the dungpiles of continuity.
* Nimbo: A ninja bimbo. For example, Psylocke, Elektra, etc.
I've got to respectfully disagree with you on Cyborg Superman and the death of Superman storyline. The storylines focusing on Superman's brilliant supporting cast were pretty good. I got the impression they could have kept me entertained and reading about the intrigues and complications for another year, if they'd wanted. While I'm not overly impressed with Eradicator, he's got potential. Cyborg Superman, Doomsday, Superboy, and especially Steel are all cool characters and great additions to the Superman mythos. I'm with you on the Parralax thing, though. Even though that started in the Superman titles, I'm not sure the blame for Parrallax really lies there. I always felt like the Coast City thing was kind of inserted there to draw interest for the new GL plans the DC editorial staff had concocted. Parallax was going to happen with or without the Death of Superman storyline.
Green Lantern Corps #2 Why am I still reading this? The art makes my eyes bleed. And that hinders good storytelling obviously. And the story's pretty pointless, though it looks like it's leading to the prince being in league with the bad guys (as the prince kills the captured bad guy before he can be interrogated). If that's not so, the story's just poorly constructed (so it can either be predictable or bad, but we'll have to wait and see which). It also seems unlikely that the new doctor GL is dead, but I wouldn't put it past them. Killing a character for cheap emotional reactions is bad writing. Moreso, when the character is too new to produce any such reactions. And it's even moreso, when you know the writer's probably just yanking your chain. She's probably not dead. But I don't know which would be a worse flaw in the writing: to have killed her or to be dumb enough to think that we'd believe that the writer would kill her. Avoid.
I didn't read Next, Green Arrow, JLA Classified, or Green Lantern Corps.
Sorry if that seems like a nada post. I actually had some comments I embedded in the original quote. They're a little hard to see. I didn't know it was going to look like that. Anyhow, they're in there for those who care.
Simon> You should stop reading DC comics, before you have an aneuyrism. You never seem pleased with what you read. It all can't be that bad.
The day I stop reading DC comics is the day I stop reading comics period, and I"m not ready to do that yet.
I really wasn't going to bother replying to this comment (didn't want to dignify it with a response), but with all the unexpected support, I felt I should at least say something.
First of all, the comment that people giving negative reviews should stop reading (or watching TV or going to movies) is always the evil, insidious half of the reviewer's Catch-22 . If I read a book and don't like it, I should stop reading it. But, if I stop reading a book and still say I didn't like it, then the noncritical anti-negativity crowd comes along and says, "How do you know that you don't like it, if you're not reading it now?" Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! Leave me alone. Whether I read or don't read is my business. If I pay my money for the books, I'm allowed to not like them. And yet the anti-negativity crowd, the people that think *everything* is wonderful, the people who would never criticize any modern comic (although they'll tell you how terrible (by comparison) comics used to be, since they never read them back then) never seem willing to accept that these comics are anything less than wonderful.
"Yes, but why would you *want* to read them?" Well, when a comic is 70% awful, it still may be 30% great. Now, I wouldn't call 30% a passing grade by any means, and I would therefore warn people away from such a comic. However, there is nonetheless 30% worth of enjoyment to be gotten from that comic. And since there is no comparable source for that 30% worth of enjoyment, if I want that tiny amount of pleasure, that miniscule amount of superheroes-done-right, I have to turn to comics to get it.
And there's another issue as well. Imagine you have a family member or close friend who has a terrible disease, cancer or whatever. And this loved one's condition is constantly deteriorating to the point that it's emotionally painful to be around them or even talk to them.
Would you abandon them? Would you stop visiting them? Not if you've got any kind of heart. Even though a sickness has transformed your loved one into a pale shadow of their former self, you can't just stop caring about them. Even if this cancer, this rot, has taken root in everyone you care about, still you will stay with them, hoping that some day a new writer (or, uh, doctor) will come along and fix them.
I thought that this week's little 'one-shot' in Superman bodes extremely well for the new creative team they've got on the book. This comic wasn't part of some big crossover, didn't have a universe-shaking plot, but did feature some great characterization and set-up the next few months of Superman stories really well.
Quote : Originally Posted by hair10, Gentlegamer, doctorfate77, d_knight7, etc.
JacinB is right.
Quote : Originally Posted by Lore Sjöberg
Superman-based interactive entertainment products tend to be very bad, because an accurate Superman game would have one button labeled "Use Powers" and you would press it and win.
I thought that this week's little 'one-shot' in Superman bodes extremely well for the new creative team they've got on the book. This comic wasn't part of some big crossover, didn't have a universe-shaking plot, but did feature some great characterization and set-up the next few months of Superman stories really well.
Till next week when the Kryptonian monkey and horse appear.
Actually, I have an odd question, that's "what ever happened to the Wonder Twins" (The Donny and Marie of the dcu) ?
Quote : Originally Posted by hair10, Gentlegamer, doctorfate77, d_knight7, etc.
JacinB is right.
Quote : Originally Posted by Lore Sjöberg
Superman-based interactive entertainment products tend to be very bad, because an accurate Superman game would have one button labeled "Use Powers" and you would press it and win.
Actually, I have an odd question, that's "what ever happened to the Wonder Twins" (The Donny and Marie of the dcu) ?
No final fate was ever recorded for the Superfriends version of the Wonder Twins, even in the comics which at least gave a nice farewell to Wendy and Marvin. However, there was a fan-created parody thing that had some rather stupid developments happen to them.
As far as the current continuity version that showed up initially in Extreme Justice, they're still around but don't really do much.
I knoew Wendy and Marvin have shown up recently, made me wonder where the twins were. Weirdest set of twins since Marvel's Wanda and Pietro... Tho not as weird as the Ultimate versions of Wanda and Pietro, but that's a thread for a psychotherapist's forum.
The day I stop reading DC comics is the day I stop reading comics period, and I"m not ready to do that yet.
I really wasn't going to bother replying to this comment (didn't want to dignify it with a response), but with all the unexpected support, I felt I should at least say something.
First of all, the comment that people giving negative reviews should stop reading (or watching TV or going to movies) is always the evil, insidious half of the reviewer's Catch-22 . If I read a book and don't like it, I should stop reading it. But, if I stop reading a book and still say I didn't like it, then the noncritical anti-negativity crowd comes along and says, "How do you know that you don't like it, if you're not reading it now?" Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! Leave me alone. Whether I read or don't read is my business. If I pay my money for the books, I'm allowed to not like them. And yet the anti-negativity crowd, the people that think *everything* is wonderful, the people who would never criticize any modern comic (although they'll tell you how terrible (by comparison) comics used to be, since they never read them back then) never seem willing to accept that these comics are anything less than wonderful.
"Yes, but why would you *want* to read them?" Well, when a comic is 70% awful, it still may be 30% great. Now, I wouldn't call 30% a passing grade by any means, and I would therefore warn people away from such a comic. However, there is nonetheless 30% worth of enjoyment to be gotten from that comic. And since there is no comparable source for that 30% worth of enjoyment, if I want that tiny amount of pleasure, that miniscule amount of superheroes-done-right, I have to turn to comics to get it.
And there's another issue as well. Imagine you have a family member or close friend who has a terrible disease, cancer or whatever. And this loved one's condition is constantly deteriorating to the point that it's emotionally painful to be around them or even talk to them.
Would you abandon them? Would you stop visiting them? Not if you've got any kind of heart. Even though a sickness has transformed your loved one into a pale shadow of their former self, you can't just stop caring about them. Even if this cancer, this rot, has taken root in everyone you care about, still you will stay with them, hoping that some day a new writer (or, uh, doctor) will come along and fix them.
And that's why.
Comics <> sick,dying family members...not the best analogy. I don't think any offense was meant by the original comment. I took it to mean, if you don't like what you're reading, why keep throwing your money away on it... which is a valid point. I don't really think the accuracy of your opinion was called into question. You're allowed to not like things. The point was... why, if you dislike something, would you continue to waste time and money reading it. No one's saying you don't have "the right" to buy and read and comment on whatever you want. Everyone is welcome to their opinion.
Comics <> sick,dying family members...not the best analogy. I don't think any offense was meant by the original comment. I took it to mean, if you don't like what you're reading, why keep throwing your money away on it... which is a valid point. I don't really think the accuracy of your opinion was called into question. You're allowed to not like things. The point was... why, if you dislike something, would you continue to waste time and money reading it. No one's saying you don't have "the right" to buy and read and comment on whatever you want. Everyone is welcome to their opinion.
Thanks, I've been looking for a respectful way to answer that all day. I think you covered it well. Rep points to you good sir.
Simon, no offense meant.
1/6th of the Brothers Prob. '19-'20 Season: 15-13(8 events) 2 wins, 2nd XDPS PR 9-7, 7th SOC