This isn't true. Characters adjacent to (or on top of) constructs are considered adjacent to Larfleeze. Larfleeze is not considered adjacent to the constructs.

Characters adjacent to or in the same square as an Orange Construct object are considered adjacent to Larfleeze for Poison and close combat purposes.

Your suggestion would only work if someone was attacking Larfleeze through a construct that was still adjacent to Larfleeze.

I would beg to differ (if the initial premise were true).

Adjacency follows the Reflective Property and Symetric Properties.

If A is adjacent to B...then B is adjacent to A.

right, but if larfleeze is A and the construct is B, there's nothing that says A is adjacent to B in the first place. he's not inherently adjacent to his constructs, he's adjacent to anything that is adjacent to or in the same square as a constructs. his orange lackeys power requires him to actually be in a space that is adjacent to a space in which there is a construct.

That is indeed true. I sit corrected.

I was gonna come up with some example, most likely complex and confusing, involving A, B and C but it looks like we have it figured out, haha.

So you can either attack Larfleeze OR the object?

No. You can only attack the object.

The clarification in the Player's Guide reads that Larfleeze considers characters adjacent to or in the same square as the object to be adjacent for Poison and close combat purposes.


A character that is not Larfleeze adjacent to a construct considers itself adjacent to the orange construct... and that's it.

At the time I made that post, there was some ambiguity; now that has been removed.